Skip to content

Scott Peterson Blogs From His Website

June 9, 2009

Many remember Laci Peterson and her husband Scott Peterson, who was convicted in killing his wife and unborn son, Conner.  Peterson, at age 36, was sentenced to death by lethal injection in March of 2005.  The details of Laci’s death are speculation and theories put together by law enforcement, but Prosecution claimed Scott Peterson dumped his pregnant wife’s body in the San Francisco Bay on Christmas Eve of 2002.  The State solicitors presented evidence that Peterson tied concrete weights to his wife’s limbs before boating out into the Bay and pushing her body over the side into the water.

 Since his sentencing, Peterson has spent the last four years in San Quentin prison in California.  His life in prison hasn’t changed much except he was moved to a cell with a sliver of a window with a view of the bay; the same one where he dumped his family.

The above photo is the latest mug shot – taken in June of 2007 – where his hair was clipped short by fellow inmates.  Under his smirky face is a placard with his inmate number and the word: “Condemned.” 

 He can’t do much in his 4-by-9 foot cell on San Quentin’s death row, and has little choices, but he can decide how to decorate his wall.  In his cell, Peterson has only one photo hanging across from his bunk…a smiling shot of Peterson and his wife, Laci.  Other inmates plaster their cells with a collage of various photos and images.  However minor that seems, it’s more than Laci has.

 Predictions that Peterson would be ostracized because of his son’s death, have not occurred.  Peterson gets along well with fellow inmates.  He seems to have a group of guys he hangs with, but none who have the notoriety of Peterson.  He spends five hours a day shooting hoops, doing pull-ups and playing cards with other inmates.  Corrections officers seem to think the inmates perceive Peterson’s crime as just killing his pregnant wife and don’t consider the death of his son in their perception.

Peterson still receives regular visits from family and friends.  He continues to receive letters from female fans who send money for his commissary account.  According to San Quentin officials, Peterson has a significant amount of money in his account from people all over the world.  He’s allowed to spend $180 a month on items such as soda, candy, cookies, toothpaste and deodorant.  Sound like another person awaiting her trial in Orange County Florida jail?

Although confined behind the walls of prison, Peterson is able to reach out to the world through blogging on a Web site set up by his family.  He is not allowed direct online connection to the internet, but he sends his comments to his family who post for him.  Peterson claims he is the victim of a poorly managed police investigation.  On March 16, 2005, Scott Peterson was sentenced to death and the judge stated the murder of Laci was “cruel, uncaring, heartless, and callous.”  In addition to protesting his innocence, Peterson writes about others’ convictions.  Peterson’s last post is on the recent arrest of the man suspected of killing Chandra Levy.  Levy’s mother lives in Modesto, where the Petersons once lived.

Peterson’s Web page includes photos of him hugging his wife Laci and blog posts of his innocence.  His personal Web site is maintained by his family who receives letters from Scott with his blog posts.  They are in full support of Scott’s innocence and have an extensive coverage of the events leading up to Laci’s murder, along with all the court documents and transcripts.  Oh, and they have a donate option if you would like to support his appeal.  If you are interested in the case, it is an interesting read. ( http://www.scottpetersonappeal.org/ )

Laci’s family has been deprived of the joys of being grandparents and an ongoing relationship with their daughter.  Not only do they deal with the fact their daughter is dead but with a horrendous crime by someone they all trusted and loved.  Deception by love and trust at it’s finest, and Peterson continues to deceive people through his blog posts and pen-pal writings.  Seems to me that once behind bars, convicted of a crime and sentenced to death, the public should not hear from an inmate.  We should be sealed off from his psychopathic mind and deviant gibberish.

Peterson is not the only inmate in California’s prisons using the internet to state their case and connect with the outside world.  How does this happen whereby inmates are allowed to state their case, connect with people, and solicit donations for appeal?  Supporters of California’s inmates set up these Web sites for pen-pal postings, inmate writings, artwork, and photos.  Most inmates use the nonprofit Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty which creates personal Web pages for death row inmates.  Inmates are using modern technology to plea their cases in the court of public opinion. 

The American Civil Liberties Union defends such Web sites calling it freedom of speech.  I thought once convicted, prisoners ultimately lost their freedom, but as we recently heard from Linda Kinney-Baden on Geraldo, inmates still have rights.  I’ve got some learning ahead of me.  Fortunately, I did learn that Florida and Michigan recently adopted laws barring inmates from soliciting pen pals on the Internet.

Essentially, Scott Peterson, although sitting on death row, enjoys somewhat of notoriety with fan mail, heavily-ladened commissary account, online blogging, prison friendship, and lots of support for his innocence.  Those who thought once Peterson was convicted and sent to prison would disappear were wrong.  He continues to enjoy the freedom to reach out on his take of world events and his innocence, and routinely receives offers of marriage.  His life goes on, although behind San Quentin walls, when his wife and son do not.

292 Comments leave one →
  1. June 11, 2009 12:47 am

    The State solicitors presented evidence that Peterson tied concrete weights to his wife’s limbs before boating out into the Bay and pushing her body over the side into the water.

    They presented no such evidence since there was none. There was no evidence of extra weights, no evidence of guilt at all. He was convicted solely by public fury.

    What was the prosecutor’s evidence? He said the only thing you needed to consider was that Laci was found ‘exactly’ where Scott was boating. Let us look at that argument. What he is saying is

    * Laci Peterson lived in California
    * Laci Peterson was abducted from California
    * Four months later Laci Peterson’s body was found in California
    * Scott Peterson lived in California

    Therefore Scott Peterson is guilty.

    That doesn’t convince me – or many others!

    Now the argument is that Scott was as close to the location where the bodies were found as 2 miles, 4 months before. We therefore ask, if another person can be found who was, say, 4 miles away from that location 8 months before are they ‘more guilty’? Most would reject this.

    As a counter proposition, if another person can be found who was, say, 1 mile away from that location 2 months before are they ‘more guilty’? Few can ignore and none has overcome the obvious logic of this.

    Thus the argument is then that if we can find any person who was closer in time and space, then Scott cannot be the only person this ‘evidence’ applies to. If there is an objection to this logic, an explanation must be offered – thus far, none has been.

    So can we find another person? Both bodies were within about 1 mile of the I-580 freeway when found, i.e. with no time allowance needed, and with thousands passing by daily. In other words 1 mile and zero days. Further, each of the people who found Conner and Laci was immediately close to them in time and in space, in other words zero distance and zero time. If they could be so close, anyone else could be as well, including the 38 million other people who also live in the state. As there are 38 million other possibles, Scott cannot be convicted on this basis. It is not even remotely sufficient to convict, even if other evidence supported it. Since no time or place of death can be established no conclusions can be based on these – we are forced to rely on the location of the bodies. The prosecutor stood on proximity to those locations and thus his major argument is destroyed.†
    What else? The jury claimed the cement residue weighed heavily in their verdict. Let us look at that.

    Even if you believe that there were 5 circles in the mess on the flat bed (and this is arguable), what can be concluded from that? All we could say is that

    * someone, we don’t know who,
    * made something, we don’t know what,
    * by some method, we don’t know how,
    * at some time, we don’t know when,
    * for some reason, we don’t know why

    So far no one can point to any evidence that fills in any of the blanks. Also, there is another question here for the prosecution which both sides ignored, “Were the alleged 5 weights made all at the same time or were they made separately?” In either case, the answer leads to another unsolvable obstruction to the prosecution case – the problem of matching, like a bullet to a gun.

    Then there is the hair. Whose was it? Could it have been another woman’s? The prosecution could not say that it could not. But even if it was Laci’s, all it tells us at best is that Scott or his clothes were in his boat at some time. How helpful is that? Was it ever in doubt?

    There is, of course, the Servas timeline. Even accepting that, a woman can be abducted in 90 seconds or less. How much use is Servas’ dubious timeline, based on unreliable guesses and estimates and changed more than once?

    Even Devore only showed that the abductor might have killed Laci within hours of abduction. The FBI will tell you that this is quite usual in kidnappings. How helpful is it to the prosecution? It still doesn’t implicate Scott, and Devore’s theory has been repudiated by his own major reference, Jeanty, in a paper Jeanty wrote (with two others).

    Since no one can tell us when Laci died, where, how or why this is not much of a case really since there is no evidence of Scott’s guilt. Fetal abduction cannot be excluded and looks far more likely to be the truth as there is considerable evidentiary support for that possibility.

    This was the prosecutor’s summation of his own case:

    “Laci Peterson washed ashore right here at Point Isabel.

    Conner Peterson washed ashore right here at the Richmond shoreline in that marshy area.

    The only man, or only person that we know without any doubt that was in the exact location where Laci and Conner’s bodies washed ashore, at the exact time that they went missing, is sitting right there. Not another soul do we, have you heard any evidence fits that description. That alone is proof beyond a reasonable doubt in this case.

    You can take that fact to the bank and you can convict this man of murder”.

    A cynic might point out that Scott Peterson would certainly be pleased if all he had to do in regards to his execution was to drive as close as 2 miles from San Quentin, 4 months before the scheduled date. However few would expect that this would be sufficiently close to the “exact location” required by the state for this purpose. Odd, then, that it is apparently sufficiently close to convict him. One suspects that any bank that saw this ‘check’ would call the police and have Mr Distaso arrested for fraud.

    • charlene sanders permalink
      April 6, 2010 11:19 am

      I just got done with the book that Laci’s mom wrote, and how could anyone, ANYONE, believe in Scott’s innocence?????????? He snuffed out the life of his pregnant wife, and stole away the life of his unborn son. What about everything that Laci and her baby boy are missing out on? Who speaks for them? They aren’t here to speak for themselves, so someone’s got to stand up and be a voice for them…..Scott is a murderer and he needs to pay for what he did- and he needs to be put to death….the way that his wife and son were put to death….at his hands. I will forever remember Laci and Conner….forever they will be in my heart and mind. Rest in peace, angers.

      • April 6, 2010 1:57 pm

        Here’s why ‘charlene’. Conner Peterson died on the 28th of Feb. Laci Peterson died 15th March. The bodies were dumped at night on April 13th. Scott Peterson couldn’t do any of those things so he’s not guilty. What’s so hard to understand?

        You must have been in the slow class at school.

        • Joke Teller permalink
          September 16, 2010 5:03 pm

          In reviewing some of your absurd posts, I found you mixing up your own facts here “Sanity”. You seem to know the exact date the bodies were dumped- that being April 13th- and yet in your post dated June 2, 2010, you seem to be saying that the body had been in the bay for 111 days.

          Oh, and by the way, the body couldn’t have been dumped the night of April 13th because Conner’s poor little body was found the day of the 13th. Oops!

          Your strategy in making yourself look more knowledgeable than anyone else seems to be calling people illiterate after they inadvertently make a typo or asking for sources to be named.

          You sound reasonably intelligent but there is no doubt a screw loose. Ted Bundy was smart. I would be very afraid to know you.

        • Anne permalink
          January 27, 2011 7:12 am

          Anyone who believes that Laci & Conner were BOTH alive past 12/24/02 hasn’t read much of what was going on. To anyone who even would suggest that Laci died in March of 2003, needs to spend some time reading things, talking perhaps to the CORNONER who examined that poor young mom, and if you remember it was noted that Conner was born in what was termed a COFFIN BIRTH….* ( means his little body was EXSPELLED from his mother AFTER HER DEATH.
          Get a life, grow up, and realize that the person you believe is innocent is not only guilty, but one of the country’s best liars.

        • attorneyatlaw permalink
          January 21, 2012 8:59 pm

          “Sanity” is a psycho. Let me guess… you are one of the crazy people who routinely proposition Scott Peterson. Hey….since you are such a boon to society, you may get your chance to love a raving lunatic, after all. I hear that DREW Peterson will be looking for wife #5 or 6 in a few months. Go ahead and get on that, and make it your life’s work to prove the world wrong that he’s not a worthless murderer like Scott. I’ll be looking forward to seeing how your obvious grasp on ‘sanity’ works out for you then.

        • stace permalink
          July 19, 2012 3:29 am

          Okay sanity.. who even says “slow class in school”? Sounds like you are socially disconnected at a minimum.. how was the ride to school on your short bus?

        • john Paul permalink
          August 30, 2012 10:36 am

          you are an Idiot, were you also on the Casey Anthony Jury????

        • Libbie Strause permalink
          July 30, 2013 5:45 pm

          You people are so ridiculous with your slurs on the intelligence and reasoning of those who do not agree with you. What is shows is a real lack of intelligence and reasoning ability since you can’t even begin to see that you could be wrong and that you show a lack of class and intelligence by having to slander those who see differently from you. A Voice For Sanity is one such loser. Yes, I said loser.

        • Chris Ferguson permalink
          July 30, 2013 6:21 pm

          And yet again no evidence offered and nothing Scott supporters say refuted…just a koolaid drinking retard calling the intelligent people stupid for calling stupid people stupid…..brilliant just brilliant

        • Sheila permalink
          July 30, 2013 9:01 pm

          Kudos Libbie. Good luck trying to get thru to Insanity. He/she’s M/O is to insult and name-call anyone who doesn’t agree with his/her warped logic. I gave up writing long ago as there is no point. I am content knowing that justice has been served and Peterson is where he belongs in a teeny tiny cell. It saddens me daily that Laci and Conner were robbed of their lives by such a horrible and selfish excuse for a human being

        • Chris Ferguson permalink
          July 30, 2013 9:20 pm

          1 piece of evidence that Scott was guilty???? Just 1 piece because there is none! I’ve listed tons of proof he’s innocent and u can’t name 1 piece of evidence of his guilt….and not only is lac I turning over in her grave over the way Scotts been treated but sheila I believe you’ll be losing sleep eventually when Scott is freed as he was completely railroaded andfound guilty by public opinion, not law, and not evidence. I hope u come home some day and find dead family members and get blamed for it….it would be such justice…..but seriously u stupid fucking cunt name 1just 1 piece of evidence of his guilt! If ucan’t shut the fuck up! (Now if u were capable of pouring piss out of a boot with instructions on the hill wed never hear from u again because there is not 1 piece of evidence of scotts guilt that has ever been provided from his trial to this day..and if any of u Scott haters had an ounce of understanding u would realize the exact same thing could happen to u and u should be outraged and scared for your freedom)

        • Sheila permalink
          July 30, 2013 9:25 pm

          Sweet. another loser who gets by with name calling and you’ve taken it to a new low. Someone of your ilk is not capable of insulting me. I have way too much class to have a dialog with a lowlife such as yourself.

        • Chris Ferguson permalink
          July 30, 2013 10:30 pm

          Well I’m not your sweet but thank u for proving me right with everything I said….wed hear from u again because you’re just to fucking stupid to pour piss out of the boot and surprise surprise yetagain not 1 piece of eevidence that Scott is guilty! I’m so sick of u stupid short sighted people thatjust “think” with your feelings and want to say Scotts guilty but not provide any evidence and to stupid to stop and think “omg, what the media and public did to Scott could happen to me”….they just tried to do the same thing with Zimmerman. There’s probably over 100 pieces of evidence that Scott is innocent on this page and not 1 piece of evidence of guilt. There CAN NOT be a debate when the guilt side in years can’t come up with 1 piece of evidence of his guilt! Again sheila thanks for proving every thing I said right!

        • Sheila permalink
          July 31, 2013 11:52 am

          Lol lol lol. The only thing you’ve proven is that you are an angry psychopath. Lmao

      • chris ferguson permalink
        March 10, 2013 11:20 am

        ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE THAT SCOTT DID A THING!!! And LOTS OF PROOF HES INNOCENT!!! Im not going to waste my time trying to convince u fools mad because he cheated but few high points….scott managed to hide every bit of forensic evidence of a murder….impossible! They found no evidence whatsoever of her murder. As scott was getting in his tiny boat a person standing ABOVE him on a bigger boat looked down at him and talked to him and said there was no body in his boat! The dogs followed her scent to the road (not back yard were prosecutors said he loaded her in truck) and COINCIDENTALLY right across that road at COINCIDENTALLY the same time as laci disappeared there was a burglary…..( always seemed to me most likely she walked up on the burglars). And to really top things off the prosecutions own hydrologist (just think water expert) said that the bodies COULD NOT….COULD NOT HAVE CAME FROM WHERE SCOTT WAS IN THE

    • kingodd permalink
      March 4, 2012 3:40 pm

      he is guilty

    • Reese permalink
      September 13, 2012 6:25 pm

      There are two types of people on this planet, there are those who have the ability to gather information, separate facts from lies, digest that information and find the logical answer to the totality of that information. Then there are people like “A Voice of inSanity.”

      Unfortunately people like “inSanity” are much too often on our juries, or are sitting behind the bench at the front of our courtrooms wearing black robes. Everyone knows Attorneys spend most of their time in collage learning the art of deception, and we make these same people judges over us.

      “If you send a fool to a school of higher learning he will come out an educated fool.” “inSanity” could be educated but he or she is still a fool. And there is nothing anyone can say that will change that. Some people will never get it because they don’t have the ability.

      There is so much more I could say about this case but why should I bother, those of you who know Peterson did it already understand, and the people like inSanity never will. We should all pray people like inSanity don’t become jurors.

      Now all we can hope is that the fools of California won’t stop Peterson from receiving the injection he so deserves.

      By the way inSanity I will not reply to any stupid things you have to say, you’re not worthy of any of my time. Plus like I said, you will never understand anyway.

      • September 13, 2012 7:58 pm

        What did the state prove and how did they prove it? (Reply using facts and logic, not illiterate ranting).

        • Reese permalink
          September 17, 2012 12:38 pm

          I am not amazed that inSanity didn’t understand my post. Even something as simple as “I will not reply to any stupid things you have to say, you’re not worthy of any of my time.” There is nothing I can add to the trial or the evidence that would help inSanity to understand. Some blindness is permanent and there is no fix.

          inSanity I know you think I’m trying to be nasty by the things I have said in my replies to your post, well I’m not. I actually feel sorry for you and people like you, I wish I could help you but only you can do that. Your ability to take in information and decipher it is hampered and you are not alone, there are many like you. A good example would be Jeffrey Dahmer who freely admitted he killed I think the number was 18 Men in the Milwaukee area so he could make love to and then eat them. He also said he would do it again if he was ever released from prison. Jeffrey would receive a shoe box of mail each day from men all over the US who said they were in love with him and wanted to be his lover. To a sane person this would be an obvious inability to take in information and decipher it. You would fall into this category, but I hope not to this extent.

          I’ll bet you think guns kill people rather then people kill people don’t you. And I’ll also bet Scott Peterson didn’t kill his wife with a gun. But people like you can’t understand that, and never will.

          So why would I want to spend my time trying to show you, or try to explain to you the irrefutable preponderance of facts that are already there for you to decipher, that you already have proven by your statements you don’t have the ability to understand. That would be a waste of my time and also a waste of any readers time.

        • chris ferguson permalink
          March 10, 2013 11:24 am

          Reese has no facts or proof just like the prosecution didnt so she runs for the bible…..at least shell pray….haha

    • Reese permalink
      September 29, 2012 12:58 am

      Really people, why are you wasting your time on this person? If you had video evidence showing Peterson killing his wife and dumping her bode in the bay inSanity would still say Peterson didn’t do it. If Scott Peterson confessed to inSanity that he killed his wife inSanity would call Scott a liar (which we all know he is).

      There is nothing you can do or say that will help inSanity understand.

      InSanity my advice to you is, don’t spend your life trying to understand your surroundings you don’t have the brains for it.

      Please people, stop wasting your time on this person.

      • chris ferguson permalink
        March 10, 2013 11:42 am

        Reese “i wont reply”…”i wont reply this time”…”i wont reply any more”….”i wont reply after this time”…..well just shut up already and stop spewing forth ur insanity….scott is innocent! Please 1, just 1 piece of irrefutable evidence that scott is in jail for any reason other than a biased jury…..speaking of jury, another interesting FACT, all the jurors who were kicked off the jury all said they thought he was innocent.

  2. CrawDad permalink
    June 11, 2009 6:12 am

    You applied logic and theory, but you failed to prove Scott Peterson is innocent. The prosecution was able to show a connection between the weights, the autopsy and his trip to the Bay. In addition, there was no proof of fetal abduction. The autopsy proved that fact. You “paint” a good theory, but alas, a jury of his peers found Scott Peterson guilty and sentenced him to death by lethal injection.

    Save your logic for an article on whether Peterson was wrongfully accused, charged, and sentenced. This article refers to his life in prison as a death row inmate. That’s a fact! He’s on death row and will remain on death row unless or until he is granted an appeal and a jury finds him not guilty. That’s a fact! No logic or theory here. Just the facts.

    Follow the link to his website and donate to his appeal.

  3. June 11, 2009 11:04 am

    The autopsy proved there WAS a fetal abduction. The uterus was cut open and the fetus removed long before the bodies were dumped. The jury shamed themselves and their country with their disgraceful verdict, a verdict not one of them has ever been able to explain. There were no weights; that was nonsense and proven so by witness testimony. The alleged 32 lb was utterly inadequate for the purpose alleged. It would have taken 300 lb of weights to hold the body down, an amount which would have sunk the boat at the dock.

    Explain why Mrs Peterson’s underwear was worn out in the seat only. Explain how her pants could have remained tied around her waist after the removal of the fetus. Either of these on their own proves her husband innocent, and there are dozens more facts which all support this. Why did the prosecution have to spend $11 million to get a conviction? Why could they find no evidence of guilt?

    A stupid verdict, applauded by fools.

    • June 11, 2009 3:13 pm

      I don’t know what autopsy report you reviewed but the one I reviewed clearly did not state the fetus was cut out of the abdomen. In fact there were no clean edges to the tissue. As I recall, it was stated that Laci’s body rubbed the bottom of the Bay which wore out a portion of her underwear.

      Everything I read in the transcripts clearly show that Laci’s baby was not a fetal abduction.

      Good luck in your support of his appeal. If he gets granted another trial then a jury will again decide on his guilt or innocence.

    • Jorge permalink
      June 2, 2010 2:51 pm

      Voice of Sanity:

      Try to have some inkling of reality before you speak and totally discredit yourself. I am a professional scientist (35 years) and 32lbs will easily hold a 150 pound body submerged, especially after the lungs fill with water. No question about it, at least until the anchoring points (in this case her wrists and ankles) tear off or are eaten off, which is what happened. If the weights had not come off, they would have imbedded in the silt bottom, and the body would not have moved, and she likely would never have been found.

      Dead females routinely “self” abort, particularly under water… the baby comes out naturally, dead, which is also what happened here. This is exactly what the forensic doctors in this case stated. (The body was too far decomposed to show physical trauma (cutting) as you erroneously state.)

      And as for the other crap you put forth, I have been following this case for over 4 years and the “facts” you state are not stated by any other sources I have found, scientific or otherwise. Do society a favor, stop making stuff up, and shut up.

      -J

      • June 2, 2010 3:37 pm

        Jorge babbled incoherent nonsense: (clipped)

        You are NOT a ‘professional scientist’ (there is no such thing). You are an idiot who makes up crap – and you are illiterate!. Stop lying to everybody. All of your statements are nonsense.

        Find 10 sources for ‘Dead females routinely “self” abort’
        Find 10 sources that agree that a perfect fetus without a mark can emerge from a decomposed female after 111 days in the bay.
        Find 10 sources that prove it is normal for a fetus to wind up double tied in twine without human intervention.
        Find 10 sources for ’32lbs will easily hold a 150 pound body submerged’ for 111 days in 6 feet of sea water.

        You are a clueless laughing stock.

      • THE voice of REAL sanity permalink
        October 14, 2011 5:38 am

        voice of sanity:
        first off there IS such thing as a ‘professional scientist’ you need a wake up call. look at all of these posts. its just you sticking up for some piece of shit murdering baby killer douche bag with no correct facts what so ever. i bet most of these people feel bad for you if anything. because this is just sad. and im talking about you not the obvious reason. that a fake husband cheated on and murdered his beautiful pregnant wife on christmas eve. and you are making up things inside your head to try and defend this bastard. i mean why??? is this you Scott.LISTEN UP, YOUR THE ONE THAT IS CLUELESS..EVERYONE IS LAUGHING AT YOU!

        • October 14, 2011 12:42 pm

          Wow! Even for a brain damaged moron you are incredibly stupid. You have no facts. I have them all. When you have learned what a fact is come back but show some imagination and make up YOUR OWN NIC.

          Scott Peterson loved his wife and would have died to protect her or his son. People like you who hate America so much are destroying it far faster than a million terrorists could.

        • lotsatailswaggin permalink
          October 14, 2011 4:46 pm

          Who in the world are you to claim that you know SP loved and would have laid down his life to protect Laci and Conner ? What credits do you have that you know this for a fact ? You sound like a blubbering fool

        • October 14, 2011 8:04 pm

          Ignorant and vicious. Not a pleasant picture you paint of yourself.

          The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior . Let’s look at Scott’s:

          From Crier’s book: –
          p. xiii. Janet (Ilse) was charmed by this courteous, self-assured young man. … Scott was especially generous, thoughtfully planning each of their dates, taking her to nice restaurants and lavishing her with intimate presents—a delicate necklace with sparkly green gemstones, a fancy black designer dress. Janet was a vegetarian, and they hadn’t been dating long when Scott announced that he had stopped eating meat. … As Scott began talking of their future together, Janet found herself falling in love.

          p. 41. (Karen) Servas described her relationship with Scott Peterson as warm and friendly. She and her ten-year-old son were frequently invited to swim in the Petersons’ pool; from time to time, Scott helped her with chores and repairs around her house. She described the couple as active and upbeat. They enjoyed entertaining at their home and appeared to have a good relationship. Servas had last seen Laci and Scott on Sunday, the twenty-second, when they told her that their baby was a boy. They were planning to name him Conner.

          p. 49. The two investigators tried to keep Scott (Peterson) talking. Did the couple have any future plans? Scott said he and Laci (Peterson) intended to move to San Luis Obispo when Conner began school. He wanted to buy an olive ranch. Grogan remarked that Scott seemed very poised in social settings; he must be a very successful salesman. Scott smiled and thanked him, saying it was important to have those skills in the sales business. Did Laci ever embarrass him in social situations? Not at all, Scott replied; she was actually quite helpful.

          p. 61. Sharon Rocha (Laci Peterson’s mother) described Laci as “headstrong,” noting that her birth sign was Taurus, the bull. This description would be echoed by friends and neighbors after her disappearance: One girlfriend suggested Laci “wore the pants” in the family, interrupting Scott when he was speaking and directing him to take out the trash in front of company. According to another friend, Laci even followed Scott to the bathroom, where he sometimes retreated from her chatter, and just kept talking to him through the door. … (Ron) Grantski’s (Sharon Rocha’s partner) only complaint was about Scott, who he felt did too much around the house. Ron was concerned that Sharon might expect the same from him.

          p. 62. Katy (Hansen, a previous girlfriend) recalled Scott as very bright, congenial, and courtly, and told the police that he never appeared stressed, even under the intense pressures of college exams. Scott started his senior project two days before the due date, yet bragged that he had aced it with an A. (His college transcripts confirmed the claim.)

          p. 67. She and Scott discussed fertility tests, but before they could pursue the idea, Laci got the news she’d been waiting for: She was pregnant at last. She was overjoyed, and Scott seemed to share her feelings. Laci’s mother recalled watching Scott hurry over to feel Laci’s stomach when she said the baby was kicking. He seemed as excited as she was. “I assume if he didn’t want to have a child, he wouldn’t have allowed it to happen,” Sharon told investigators.

          p. 69. Relatives told police that (Laci) even used a wheelchair while visiting Disneyland with Scott’s parents and half sister, Anne Bird (It was Scott who pushed her all over Disneyland in the chair) … In our interview, Anne told me that Laci looked radiant during that trip. She was excited about having the baby and talked a lot about how much she loved her mother, Sharon. Anne first met Laci in March 1998, about seven months after the wedding. She liked her immediately. Laci filled up the room, loved being the center of attention, and rarely let anyone else get a word in edgewise. Like Laci’s other girlfriends, Anne agreed that Laci did boss Scott around. And, like those women, Anne wished she had a husband like Scott, who did everything his wife told him with a smile.

          p. 107. “And then that was the last we had talked about it,” Sharon explained. Laci’s parents thought Laci and Scott had a good marriage. “Even when Scott should have been mad at Laci, he wasn’t,” Ron told the detective. The couple had never separated according to Sharon and Ron, and they spent up to 90 percent of their time together. They shared the same goals, including having a child and buying a larger home. Grogan was taking notes. “Neither Sharon nor Ron ever heard Scott or Laci become involved in an argument, raise their voices at each other, or complain about any problems with their relationship,” he noted.

          p. 132. (Amber Frey describing an encounter with Scott) “I looked down and there was a single rose that was odd from all of ‘em, and I pulled it out and I said, ‘What’s with this single rose?’ and he said, ‘Well, you have a candle?’ And I said, yeah. He said, ‘Can you get the candle?’ Sure. So I get the candle, he shuts the light out and lights it and says, ‘Well, I, this is all I could think about in San Francisco when I woke up today.’ So he cuts the rose, the stem off, and it’s just, you know, a short stem at this point with the rose.
          “He started—he starts rubbing the rose on my face and kissing me, and he said that. . . ah, he was just talking about his dream that he had. And then he leaned me up against the wall and was rubbing the rose down my neck and he was saying, ‘I don’t know how it feels to have a rose rubbed all over me, but this is how I woke up.’ His dream, apparently, that he was having. And he unzipped my top that I had on and was kissing me and ah, it was pretty, you know, intense.

          p. 171. During her childhood, Amy (Rocha, Laci’s half sister), Brent (Rocha), and Laci had stayed with their father on weekends. Amy first met Scott while she was in the eighth grade, when Laci was invited to teach Amy’s cheerleading squad a new cheer, and she brought Scott along. She and Laci had grown close after Laci returned to Modesto in 2000. Amy described her sister’s relationship with her husband as a good one. The two seemed very much in love, she said. She never heard them argue, and Laci had never confided anything negative about Scott to her. She characterized Laci as easily excited, a “talker” who was often “antsy” and “high energy.” Scott, however, was calm and relaxed. He never appeared stressed or ruffled, and always seemed “laid-back.” Amy also described Laci as “a little spoiled.” She usually got her way by asking for things nicely, but isn’t a brat. “She got anything she wanted because Scott tried to give it to her,” Amy explained.

          p. 264. “As far as any violence with Scott,” Grogan asked, “any violent acts that you’re aware of as a juvenile or anything?”
          “No, absolutely not. I mean, not even as a, not even as a five-year-old or ten-year-old, I never saw him lose his temper,” Mark (Peterson, Scott’s estranged half brother) said.
          “Never, even as a child?”
          “No.”

          Pp. 287,288. During the long meeting at headquarters, all four women reported that … they had viewed Scott as a “good, attentive” husband. They based their impressions on his willingness to endure some of the “small irritations” that Laci thrust upon him. The consensus was that Laci was an incessant talker, and that her ceaseless chatter sometimes irritated those around her.
          The women recalled that once, at a party, Scott had told a friend that Laci’s talking was so constant that he sought refuge in the bathroom—only to have Laci follow him to the door and just keep chatting. The women agreed that Laci’s constant jabbering didn’t dull their affection for her, but they admired Scott for his patience. … Renee (Tomlinson, friend of Laci) remembered that the previous summer, when Scott was out of town, she was at the house when he called to speak with Laci. Renee overheard Laci asking him about the status of their health insurance, since she was in the first stages of her pregnancy. When Laci learned that the insurance wasn’t active, she accused Scott of not caring about her and the baby. For weeks after the phone confrontation, Laci had expressed frustration over her husband’s failure to take care of the insurance issue. It was the only time that Renee recalled her being truly upset with her husband.
          The women also agreed, however, that Laci regularly ordered her husband around in front of her friends, telling him to take out the garbage, change a CD on the stereo, and perform other jobs around the house … the women all thought it was “so cool” that-Laci was able to give Scott directions without him getting angry.

          Pp. 290,291 Stacey Boyers (friend of Laci) told Buehler that when she found out that her own boyfriend, Brian Argain, was cheating on her, both Scott and Laci were very supportive throughout their breakup. Marie (Rocha, Laci’s aunt) also told the detective that her niece could be headstrong at times. Laci often talked about babies, and “If Laci wanted to have a baby, she would have a baby whether Scott wanted one or not,” she said. Marie described Laci as a loving and kind person, but also stubborn and accustomed to getting her way. Yet she was “totally in love with Scott” and never said a derogatory word about her husband.

          Pp. 322,323. Anne (Bird) recalled that Scott and Laci seemed “very happy” during the family’s Thanksgiving trip. Scott had even rented Laci a wheelchair so that he could wheel his pregnant wife around Disney’s California Adventure Park and “pamper her.” Anne didn’t think Laci needed the wheelchair, but she went along with it to humor Scott. Scott told police he had rented it “to cut down on the amount of walking” she had to do. The young couple appeared to get along well, and Scott seemed excited over his impending fatherhood. During the trip, he carried Anne’s six-month-old son in a car seat. He even comforted him one night at dinner and managed to stop his crying, Anne recalled.

          p. 356. Heather (Richardson, Laci’s maid of honor) also recalled an argument between Scott and Laci after Scott’s graduation from Cal Poly. She and Mike had attended a celebratory dinner with the couple afterward. Heather could tell that Laci was upset. When they left the restaurant, everyone drove to the house Scott was sharing with his three roommates. Laci and Scott went into the bathroom. Heather overheard her yelling at him. Scott did not respond.
          “It sounded like he was just taking it,” Heather said.

          p. 425. In addition to Scott’s family members, myriad individuals offered anecdotes about Scott: his high school coach, a Cal Poly professor, his former boss at the restaurant where he worked in San Luis Obispo. Not one of them could imagine Scott committing these crimes.
          “I can’t reconcile the accusations with the person I’ve known,” one said. “The Scott Peterson I know is the kind of person you respect and admire,” said another. “He is the absolutely last person I would ever think would be suspected for something like this,” offered a third. Such sentiments were heard over and over, as thirty-nine people took the stand.

          This is not the description of a sociopath. In fact, it is the description of the exact opposite, a sociophile. Scott Peterson would have given his life to save any woman, and most certainly his wife.

        • lotsatailswaggin permalink
          October 14, 2011 10:45 pm

          You ramble on and on as usual. You still haven’t answered my question: You proclaim to know how SP really felt and their is no possible way you could if you do not know him. Many people cheat but those who really love their spouse and are just in it for sex, do it in their spare time and stop short of hurting the one they really love. Not so when SP told Laci that he was going on a business trip and left her to attend the Dec. xmas party alone. And where was he – with his mistress. People in love do not hurt their partners, especially their pregnant partners, like that.

          You must have no life what so ever since you monitor this blog 24/7 and answer every comment immediately.

        • October 14, 2011 11:57 pm

          You really ARE a dullard. I get an email whenever anything is posted here. I don’t have to monitor anything.

          And since the evidence proves Scott Peterson is innocent beyond the slightest doubt, That’s all anyone needs to know. The state failed to find him guilty. The jury lynched him anyway. Shame on them and on you.

        • lotsatailswaggin permalink
          October 18, 2011 7:24 am

          Oops, so you are monitoring the email instead of the blog. Point is that you seem to have nothing better to do with your life than read emails pertaining to SP the second they come in and respond asap. Most people are out enjoying their lives and just read their emails sporadically.

          You haven’t answered me as to how you could possibly know that SP “loved” Laci and Conner “so much” that he would’ve laid his life down for them. It is a statement you can’t prove or back up which just adds to your total lack of credibility.

          And one more thing: kids stop name calling about the time they reach the age of 12. You cannot write a post without attempting to demean people by insulting them and calling them names. Says alot about you.

        • October 18, 2011 1:08 pm

          I’ve come to understand that 98% of people are as dumb as a sack of rocks.

          Every one of your posts has underscored that.

          And as for insults, you’ve posted nothing BUT libels against Scott Peterson. Not one person on the planet can point to even one piece of valid evidence against him. The jury, described elsewhere as the 12 dumbest hillbillies in Redwood City, have admitted they voted out of prejudice and fear and not at all based on evidence — since they saw none either.

        • lotsatailswaggin permalink
          October 27, 2011 10:53 am

          “Scott Peterson loved his wife and would have died to protect her or his son.”

          Again, you can’t possibly know this yet you declared it anyway.

          If SP truly loved and wanted to protect his wife and unborn son, he wouldn’t have allowed her to go to a Christmas party alone, at night, while he was off frolicking with a girlfriend.

          If SP truly loved and wanted to protect his wife and unborn son, he wouldn’t have traveled 90 miles away,voluntarily, in a secret boat, and left her alone on Christmas eve day.

          Having a loving husband myself who indeed wants to protect his family, I can say this with ease. The furthest my husband ever was during my 3rd trimesters, was 30 miles and that was all work related. For leisure and voluntary activities he was even closer. And that goes for all my friends husbands as well.

          If that’s your idea of love and protection, I feel sorry for your family. That is, if you have one.

        • Donna permalink
          July 4, 2012 9:39 am

          I am not here to defend this “Sanity” comment, but come on how can you sit and write the things you do? You call Scott a baby killer a man that murdered his wife, slept around on her etc. He did cheat, this should tell people he was not this happy husband everyone wanted to call him. He could not even go to the bathroom without her nagging him, even shutting the door she still nagged through the door. He was UNHAPPY people, but you like everyone else did not give him a fair trial. you like others wanted to blame ANYONE, so it was Scott The husband. No this is not justice, for anyone Not Scott, not Lacie and certainly not Conner. He needs people out here to help him. I will be the first to start a Petition for Scott to be moved off Death Row. He if anything needs to be out if not then a lifer not death row. I will be writing to Scott soon, I like others feel he should be granted this Appeal and YES it needs to be overturned. NO ONE KNOWS WHAT REALLY HAPPENED THAT DAY. remember she was not everything they said she was. a bubbly happy girl, who was so in love with her husband. whatever, she was a nag, wo was in control of her husband and I would have been MISREBALE too. Would you?

    • kingodd permalink
      March 4, 2012 3:43 pm

      the autopsy said no such thing

  4. June 11, 2009 5:01 pm

    As always, all of your ‘facts’ are wrong. In fact the prosecution’s ridiculous claim was that she rested face down with her arms and legs weighted to the bottom and her body floating above. Thus there was no way her underwear could have that specific wear pattern. That wear pattern is a sure sign that she wore them out by continuous wear over several weeks. The fact is that the baby was never in the sea, even for a minute, as it was laid exactly where it was found and that Laci’s body was found within 24 hours of it being dumped in the sea which happened around April 12th. Her husband is innocent.

    No human body can survive for 111 days in the bay without becoming a skeleton. That process completes in about 28 days or less, not well in excess of 111. Her body is further proof of his innocence.

  5. Limone permalink
    June 14, 2009 5:12 am

    You need to read, or reread the trial transcripts of the prosecutions case if you are under the delusion Scott is not guilty. It was proved beyond any shadow of a doubt, and if you think he’s innocent it’s either because you have no knowledge of the case, or you have no comprehension skills. His defense team could not, and did not refute any of the evidence against him, because he did it.

    Very interesting that the family is still hanging on to their mother’s denial her spoiled brat excuse for a son is innocent. That website will be pulled by his family the day mommy dearest dies.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 12:58 pm

      There was no evidence given!!!!
      1, just 1 piece of evidence please u brainwashed idiot?!?!

      • March 11, 2013 1:24 pm

        You’ll find the intelligent discussions here:

        www DOT sleuthingforjustice DOT com

        Can’t post the link because it prevents posting here!

        Use the information in the Welcome topic to join.

        We delete the ranting loons who have nothing to say, esp. those who are ‘certain’ Scott is guilty but can’t post any evidence to prove it, just insults against everyone with a brain.

  6. June 14, 2009 10:44 am

    I’ve read the transcript. I have a copy of it on my computer. A careful read of it shows three things:
    1) At no point in the 5 month, $11 million prosecution did the prosecutor offer even one piece of evidence that went to the guilt of Scott Peterson. Not one.
    2) His entire, ever changing theory was an impossibility. It was riddled with impossibilities and ridiculous assumptions.
    3) Even the prosecutor knew he had no valid evidence. I see no other reason why he would repeatedly lie to the jury in his closing, stating that black was white and white black when his own witnesses had testified to the opposite facts. Much of his closing consisted of him trying to ‘testify’ as if he were an expert witness, something he clearly was not.

    You can read my analysis of his closing here:

    http://thevoiceofsanity.blogspot.com/2007/07/prosecutors-case.html

    The Prosecutor’s Case
    “One way to look at the prosecution case is to study the closing statements. This is where the prosecutor can expound on his theory and show how the actual evidence makes his theory the only one which fits all of the facts. In this case it is shocking to see how poorly the theory and facts fit together, and how often the prosecutor resorted to trying to testify himself, testimony not supported by anything except his own opinions.”

    • Frank permalink
      September 27, 2010 10:16 pm

      You have major issues! The guy is more guilty than O.J

      • frank permalink
        November 7, 2010 10:22 pm

        no he isnt he is a nice guy

      • Corey permalink
        August 21, 2012 2:24 am

        How can you be “more guilty” than OJ? I would say Scott is just as guilty. He murdered his wife and OJ did the same.
        Also, why argue with “Voice of Sanity?” What’s the point? He/she just makes up facts and distorts the truth as he/she see’s fit. Sanity’s “facts” are just creepy, in that, it’s creepy, (and scary) that someone who’s mind is so distorted is out there……somewhere.
        I’m guessing that there are many “Sanity’s” are out there. Finding people like OJ and Casey Anthony innocent because they have a low IQ and can’t follow reason, een when it is right in front of them. – SCARY.

      • chris ferguson permalink
        March 10, 2013 1:06 pm

        1 piece of evidence please, just 1 and well ignore all the PROOF hes innocent….please provide 1 piece of evidence that poor scott is guilty of anything (except for having low standards…. damn ambers hideous…. yeah, he wanted to leave his pretty wife and son for ambers horse face and some other guys kid… yeah right!!

  7. Sam Sloan permalink
    July 16, 2009 9:07 pm

    Hey “Voice of Sanity” I guess he had no motive, did not cheat on his pregnant wife, did not order up porn right after her disapearance (nothing says, “I’m really worried about my pregnant missing wife” than spanking it to the Spice channel) and did not take an “unusual” fishing trip when she disapeared………………..Really? I laugh at the fact that his family is trying to raise money. The only takers will be people like you and fat, psycho, under- sexed females that would gravitate towards him because T. Bundy is dead…unless that describes you. If it does, you better make your move, get your conjugal visits before the state finally rids itself of this waste of money.

    • February 22, 2010 9:31 am

      You summed it up wonderfully. Those that want to desperately believe SP is innocent, must leave all logic and assumed brain matter at the door. Unbelievable. You made me chuckle if that is possible in such a tragic case.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 1:17 pm

      Cheating, porn (which was soft core AT BEST) and a fishing trip MILES from where the bodies washed up (which the prosecutions own hydrologist said the bodies could not have come from where scott was) does not equal guilt! Can u give just 1 piece of evidence of scotts guilt????

  8. July 17, 2009 12:05 am

    Well, “Sam Sloan”, unlike you I don’t let my TV tell me what to think. So far not one person, and clearly not you, can explain the underwear without realizing that it proves Scott innocent. Considering that the state had ZERO evidence, and was forced to rely on the sort of nonsense you spout, even crackpots lie Nancy Grace have admitted he wil get a new trial.

    $11 million. Zero evidence of guilt. Not guilty.

    • Sam Sloan permalink
      July 19, 2009 9:10 am

      Ok Voice of Sanity………….

      I see where this is going, or rather not going. Please, let me ask you this. Public records that I read, not television, indicated a very long list of camping/survival type gear that was inventoried in Scott Peterson’s car when he was arrested on his way to “play golf”. That combined with his obvious change in appearance would, to me, indicate someone who was getting ready to go on the run. Here is my problem with this case and you. You are ignoring Scott Peterson’s “documented” actions. Innocent people don’t act like that….period. That is why he is in prison where he belongs despite the efforts of his misguided family and well meaning people like you.

      • December 31, 2009 5:31 pm

        None of this matters. We know that his wife lived long after the 24th. We know his son was full term. It is impossible to show any way in which these facts can be reconciled with his involvement, therefore it wouldn’t matter if he had a James Bond disguise kit and a portable space ship in his car – HE WAS NOT INVOLVED.

        The crap he had in his car would make it impossible for him to cross any border, and it matches no list of equipment anyone would use on land or at sea for an extended period. It was just junk he hadn’t dumped anywhere.

        Like too many you are are too gullible. You believe that the media are competent professionals doing a thorough job. They are none of these things. Once, they were incompetent. Now, they are lazy as well.

        Click on my name and read the first two pages there. It’ll take less than three minutes. They summarize the actual trial evidence, almost all presented by the state and what the prosecutor claimed was his ‘rock solid’ case.

        Presenting what he had in his car as if it were evidence shows how pathetic the state’s case was, as was almost everything else the state proffered. They relied solely on public fury to convict an innocent man.

        A public disgrace for all involved.

        • Jorge permalink
          June 2, 2010 3:07 pm

          His baby was not full term. Period. Find one independently verifiable source that says differently. You are simply lying. I have read the autopsy for both bodies.

      • chris ferguson permalink
        March 10, 2013 1:35 pm

        If i was being hounded by media and death threats from emotional retards id probably change my appearance but he said it was from a pool and the camping gear was easily explained away too (there wasn’t much at all)…..but lets go with ur theory that he was fixing to “run”….lets see an intelligent person has just lost everything and can see the media and police are railroading u and completely ignoring all other evidence and suspects and going to kill u, i think any intelligent person would “run”….but again “running ” is not evidence of guilt!!

  9. StreetSmart1 permalink
    July 19, 2009 5:14 pm

    Last week it was announced that his family is trying to raise money now on the website for his defense fund. Seems they want some new testing done also.

  10. September 8, 2009 2:25 pm

    I agree 100% that Scott is innocent. They had such an awful case, the guy was lynched basically. Everyone ignores the fact that this was NOT the first time a pregnant woman had been found in that bay with her feet and hands and head removed and fetus cut out.

    Evelyn Hernandez was 9 months pregnant in May of 2002 (laci was killed around december of 2002) when she went missing and then was found with her hands, head and feet missing and fetus cut out in the same bay.

    People also ignore that there was NO physical evidence found. Not a drop of blood not an ounce of body fluids. Nothing. The guy is innocent, he may not be the brightest bulb out there but he is definitely innocent.

    • Daisy permalink
      October 8, 2009 11:17 am

      He is “definitely” innocent? Oh please. He is as guilty as OJ Simpson was, but luckily, he didn’t get away with it like OJ did. Scott knows what he did, his guilty conscience has to be eating away at him in that little jail cell he SO deserves to be in. There is not a doubt in my mind that he is a cold blooded killer and will rot in hell. He killed his own baby for God’s sake, he deserves NO MERCY.

      • chris ferguson permalink
        March 10, 2013 1:37 pm

        Please please just give 1 piece of evidence….. just 1

  11. October 8, 2009 5:30 pm

    Blah, blah, blah. All opinion – no evidence. Explain why Scott would abduct his own wife, keep her prisoner somewhere, cut his own son out of her living body, then dump the bodies in the worst place on the planet (for him) for them to be found. Explain how he did this while being followed 24/7. I won’t hold my breath.

    • Josh Powell permalink
      January 24, 2010 9:20 pm

      Voice of Insanity,
      He dumped her body in that spot BECAUSE that’s where Evelyn Hernandez was found. Morons… Scott is a lying, murdering scumbag who also happens to be pretty smart. If YOU were smart, you’d take on a more plausible cause, like proving the existence of the Loch Ness Monster.

      • January 24, 2010 9:38 pm

        Always good to know there’s no shortage of idiots such as yourself in the USA.

        How could he have dumped the bodies where and when they were found? The police admitted they were following him 24/7 and still were in April — and they knew exactly what he looked like. He had no chance to get them and dump them. Clearly this was done by some other person.

        • Donna permalink
          July 18, 2012 1:54 pm

          Before this all begun with the police, he did what he did to her body, so they say/ If he had done this it would not have been after calling and asking the parents of Lacie if they had seen her, and telling them she was missing? No the police was not even involved at the time these things was done to the body.
          Even more so, any one thinking that it is not possible that another person may have done this to His wife & the unborn child that she was soon to deliver.They should really take a harder look at everything, 1,although he was having an affair, does not mean he Murdered his wife. 2. The police always suspect the spouse before any one else is suspected of the crime.3, He was very UN-happy with his life at that point with his wife, this is why he started seeing Amber. (yes, he, should have been up-front and honest with her about being married, but he wasn’t. 4, He was in debt up too his eye balls, even though they had money issues, it did not seem to bother Lacy, she was shopping not to long before she went missing. 5. Scott acted strange, guilty to be exact. but how are you to act when your pregnant wife is gone missing and no one knows where she is, or if she is even alright? He was damned if he did, and damned if he don’t. so why is it that everyone is blaming him? you could turn what everyone was saying around and anyone you wanted guilty. it really is not hard, when you need someone to blame and the police didn’t know how to do their job or want to do their JOB. so he was the one that they nailed. Scott is a good man, DO NOT JUDGE PEOPLE, ylet God be the judge and jury. he will be seeing him one day and he will get everything that is coming to him, as will we all.

  12. dubble44trubble permalink
    October 23, 2009 1:40 am

    you murdering wild animal still think you made a good choice…wouldn’t it be nice to just go out tonight and grab a cup of coffee at the local dunkin doughnuts? you can’t ever go out again because of the choices YOU MADE LACI….. R.I.P

  13. Daisy permalink
    October 27, 2009 12:20 pm

    He didn’t abduct her, he killed her in their home, put her body in the boat, and dumped her in the bay, with cement anchors tied to her. He thought she’d never surface, but her body did. I’m sure her head is still at the bottom of the San Francisco bay. The baby came out from being in the water, IT WAS NOT CUT OUT. Read the facts.

    • October 27, 2009 1:09 pm

      The state spent $11 million and couldn’t prove ONE of these silly claims of yours. In a 5 month trial they couldn’t offer ANY evidence of Scott’s guilt – EVER. Their entire case was quite impossible – it couldn’t be done, which the state knew and feared.

      If he was so guilty, why did the police destroy so much evidence and make so many witnesses ‘unavailable’ to the defence? Why did the police lie under oath? Why did they manufacture evidence?

      • January 27, 2010 12:13 am

        please…..it’s so obvious he’s guilty that it scares me there are people like you defending him. Do you remember the small fact about him lying to his “girl friend” that he was in Europe, when he was at a memorial for Laci! Why would an innocent man lie about that! He is a psychopath and the whole world knows he’s guilty (but a few like you)

        • January 27, 2010 12:50 am

          Why don’t you offer your services to the state as sole decider for all cases? After all, if you have this god like power to determine guilt or innocence without any concern as to mundane matters like evidence and logic you are surely wasting your time here.

          However I note your claim that this is a ‘fact': “… him lying to his ‘girl friend’ that he was in Europe, when he was at a memorial for Laci!”

          What you have written is a lie:

          * It wasn’t a memorial, it was a vigil.
          * He phoned Frey before the vigil for a minute – and got her voice mail.
          * His tales of travel were designed to dump Frey.
          * All lies he told were to or about Frey. See Ted Haggard. See John Edwards. See Tiger Woods. Men lie for sex. Did you never learn that?

          Your magical powers seem to have deserted you. I wouldn’t want to see you sit in judgment on a school yard spat, let alone an actual court case. You aren’t as clever as you think.

          The state never found even one piece of evidence against Peterson. Everything they found went to innocence, none to guilt. So much for your ‘certainty’.

          Scott Peterson is innocent.

        • February 22, 2010 9:35 am

          Let’s not forget how he managed to find amusement and laughter at the memorial, while everyone else was somber or emassed in grief and tears.

        • chris ferguson permalink
          March 10, 2013 1:45 pm

          Ding ding ding….i think we found a jury member here……omg the lack of logic is truly jaw dropping…..lying to a SLUT doesnt make u guilty of murdering ur wife!!! (Especially when theres tons of proof ur innocent) im curios in ur expert mind at exactly what point does an innocent person come clean with the slut?

  14. Daisy permalink
    November 4, 2009 9:56 am

    If he’s so “innocent” – then why is he sitting on death row at San Quentin? I’m glad 12 other people agree with me and most of the rest of the world. He’s exactly where he deserves to be. He isn’t getting out, EVER!

    • December 8, 2009 3:23 am

      Because 12 hand selected idiots couldn’t understand the facts or the law as they were explained to them and voted on their ‘feelings’ instead – after those who DID have some understanding were ruthlessly eliminated from the jury.

      • Casey Codorniz permalink
        March 8, 2010 9:38 am

        Remember insanity,the denfense also chose the jurous…another fact you left out!!!

  15. Dawn Kekel permalink
    November 6, 2009 6:08 am

    Where do all these people get these crazy ideas about the baby being cut out and Laci being decapitated? Read the facts and the court notes. Read the book “Stone Cold Guilty” by Loretta Dillon – real facts that prove beyond doubt that he is a cold hearted murdering narcissist who deserves to be incarcerated and FORGOTTEN!!!!! Rot in HELL Scott – you know you will.

    • December 8, 2009 3:26 am

      Dillon’s ‘book’ is a joke – a rambling mess not worth printing on paper. She has no facts and no understanding.

      Stop trying to ‘think’, Dawn, it’s not in your skill set.

      • Josh Powell permalink
        January 24, 2010 9:29 pm

        Voice of Inanity,
        “Stop trying to ‘think’, Dawn, it’s not in your skill set.”

        Wow, if that isn’t the pot calling the kettle black! You haven’t offered one cogent thought that even comes close to suggesting Peterson is innocent. Time for you to put up or shut up:
        What, specifically, is inaccurate about Dillon’s book? Sorry, “rambling mess” isn’t helpful.
        What, specifically, proves Laci was alive for any length of time after Dec. 24? Note I said PROVES she was alive, not more of your brainless, unsubstantiated theories.
        Why did Peterson repeatedly lie about his actual whereabouts and his affair with Amber? You must have a good explanation for this since you are so confident he is innocent.

        • January 24, 2010 9:43 pm

          “You haven’t offered one cogent thought that even comes close to suggesting Peterson is innocent.”

          On the contrary, I have offered nothing but. I suggest you reread the section on Laci’s underwear and explain the condition of them AS TESTIFIED TO BY THE STATE’S WITNESS TO THE STATE’S PROSECUTOR. In and of itself this proves Scott is innocent.

  16. James K. Davis permalink
    December 4, 2009 7:19 pm

    What a sick society we live in. Marriage proposals, money to his prison account, and
    some degree of stardom. Scott Peterson, Casey Anthony, O.J. “Simple” Simpson and other
    vermon of their ilk should be removed from earth at the earliest possible time. What is
    alarming is the followers and supporters of this trash. What have we become? Where are
    we going? I am for the most part liberal and progressive in my beliefs and political orientation. However, I am pro death penalty and feel it is all we have left to deal with
    certain types of criminals. Rapist, child molesters, killers, and the like have
    all lost their rights to live amongst us. Scott Peterson is in prison but still has a voice.
    Laci has no voice. She is just a memory. Execute this slime and lets try to remove him
    from our memory.

    • December 8, 2009 3:20 am

      “Laci has no voice.”

      Indeed. If she had one she would be ripping you and those like you a new one for your ridiculous attacks against her husband and criticizing the utter failure of the MPD to rescue her while she and her son were still alive, a possibility that existed for weeks after Dec 23rd.

    • Dawn Kekel permalink
      February 19, 2010 5:04 am

      I agree with absolutely everything you have said except for one thing “execute this slime”. No thats letting him off the hook. He should be being punished daily by hard labour and pain for the rest of his life, suffering daily, instead of the cushy life he has on death row, shooting hoops and hanging out!!! Make the bastard suffer!!!

      • February 19, 2010 1:58 pm

        So, ‘Dawn’, will you take his place doing this “hard labour and pain for the rest of his life, suffering daily” once he is found not guilty and released? Or are you so cowardly that you don’t have the guts to take what you dish out to other Americans?

        • Casey Codorniz permalink
          March 8, 2010 9:45 am

          95% of americans believe scott is guilty.there are a few pinheads out there who think he is innocent!!!

  17. Sara permalink
    December 31, 2009 4:30 pm

    “A Voice of Sanity”… Apparently, you are a friend, or relative, or some kind of disillusioned ignorant being that thinks he knows everything. Get your head out of your ass. All you continue to reiterate is, “11 million dollars, Zero evidence of guilt, Not guilty.” THIS IS AMERICA. Without evidence, NO JURY will give someone the death penalty ‘just because’. The prosecution did their job, the defense DID NOT because they didn’t stand a chance. Scott made ONE TOO MANY mistakes. The guy was f******* his girlfriend while his WIFE AND SON went missing for chirst sakes!!! He LIED to his FAMILY!!!! He lied to his FRIENDS!!!!! He lied to everyone!!!! I know we are not all perfect, we all lie, BUT, what kind of a sane man LIES CONTINUOUSLY while he knows he is being investigated for murder? A guilty one. A guy who has a lot to hide. Whether you think you know everything or not, IT DOESN’T MATTER. What you think, doesn’t matter. It’s ONLY your OPINION. If there was no evidence, if there was nothing to go on, he wouldn’t be sitting on Death Row. Period. Fact of the matter is, they could not prove if Connor was cut out of the body because the skin tissue was too warped from being in the water. It’s common sense. Obviously you have none. Just remember, you WERE NOT in that jury room, you were not in the court room, you have not read all the documents of this case, so therefor, you have no ground to be concluding that he is innocent. Your only fooling yourself.

    • December 31, 2009 5:22 pm

      “Apparently, you are a friend, or relative, or some kind of disillusioned ignorant being that thinks he knows everything.”

      No, none of those. While I may not know everything, I know BS when I see it and this case was all BS.

      “Get your head out of your ass.”

      I never put it there. I’ll rely on you for notes on the experience.

      “All you continue to reiterate is, “11 million dollars, Zero evidence of guilt, Not guilty.”

      Because it’s true.

      “Without evidence, NO JURY will give someone the death penalty ‘just because’.”

      Sure they will. There is a long list of innocents released from wrongful conviction, some mere days from execution. Want a list?

      “The prosecution did their job”

      The prosecution offered a long series of lies. There was more than one in the closing speech.

      “The defense DID NOT because they didn’t stand a chance.”

      True. A hand picked, senile judge and a jury where members were replaced if they wouldn’t vote guilty with no evidence.

      Scott made ONE TOO MANY mistakes.

      So did you.

      “The guy was f******* his girlfriend while his WIFE AND SON went missing for chirst sakes!!!”

      Factually incorrect.

      “He LIED to his FAMILY!!!! He lied to his FRIENDS!!!!!”

      About sex. So did Tiger Woods – and thousands of others.

      “He lied to everyone!!!!”

      No he didn’t. Everything he told the cops was true. They admitted it in court.

      “I know we are not all perfect, we all lie, BUT, what kind of a sane man LIES CONTINUOUSLY while he knows he is being investigated for murder?”

      Factual error. The cops admitted that everything he told them was true. The real liars were the police and prosecutors – and some of their tame witnesses.

      “If there was no evidence, if there was nothing to go on, he wouldn’t be sitting on Death Row.”

      Happens all the time.

      “Fact of the matter is, they could not prove if Connor was cut out of the body because the skin tissue was too warped from being in the water.”

      The prosecution has to prove he was not. They found no such proof, offered no such proof.

      “It’s common sense.”

      You have none.

      “Just remember, you WERE NOT in that jury room, you were not in the court room.”

      I’ve read the full transcript and supporting documents.

      “you have not read all the documents of this case, so therefor, you have no ground to be concluding that he is innocent.”

      Wrong again.

      “Your only fooling yourself.”

      I never do that.

      The state spent $11 million. They put 20 prosecutors on this case (only) for 6 months. They hired special consultants to turn the rubbish into something resembling a case. The D.A. spent $24,000 to purchase tapes of television shows to try to see what would fool a jury best. They studied every newspaper report on the case.

      What they never found was even one piece of evidence that went to guilt. Where possible, they destroyed evidence that led away from Scott. And yet, despite all of this, despite using 4 juries, they still found only evidence that proved he was innocent of the crimes charged. No honest juror could vote for guilty based on the evidence in court. Scott wound up with no honest jurors.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 2:13 pm

      Not 1 word of truth…..im tired of typing…but me and voice of sanity have given plenty of evidence of his innocence…. what proof did u just give of guilt? “HE LIED”…..well ur a crack detective there…he lied, hes guilty….wow why couldnt i see it before?

      • kingodd permalink
        March 10, 2013 2:38 pm

        did Scott ever take a lie detector test?

        • chris ferguson permalink
          March 10, 2013 2:49 pm

          No i dont believe he ever took a lie detector test….but IRRELEVANT! This is still supposedly america and he didnt have to take a lie detector test which arent allowed in court BECAUSE they arent reliable and dont detect lies, they detect stress! He just lost his wife and baby….and being accused of doing it….hes STRESSING!!

        • kingodd permalink
          March 10, 2013 3:37 pm

          all the more reason to take the test. if the police, media, and public all feel that he is guilty prior to the trial, why not take it? it only makes sense if you are truly innocent. even if he fails the test, they cant use it against him.

        • chris ferguson permalink
          March 10, 2013 5:49 pm

          U dont give ur accusers more ammo….while a lie detector couldnt be used in court he wasnt convicted in court but in the court of public opinion….and the public would certainly have known about it….but again, IRRELEVANT, he didnt have to take and vast majority of defendants and accused never take one but most of all theres absolutely no evidence that hes guilty! The prosecution didn’t come up with any….andive challenged just about everyone on here that says hes guilty to give just 1 piece of evidence and so far nothing….

  18. Kim permalink
    February 8, 2010 6:36 pm

    Who cares what “voice of sanity” has to say….I’m looking forward to the day they inject!!!!!!
    enough money has been wasted keeping this man behind bars….get rid of him already!

  19. faure permalink
    February 9, 2010 7:04 pm

    Voice of Insanity: you gotta be Scott P. or his ma or pa. You are as tenacious and unifocused as Scott on his pursuit to kill Laci and chase after Amber. As narrow minded and arrogant as Scott was in his ‘deadly game’ of leading on the cops/detectives/relatives/friends with his incessant and magical lies that poured from his unthinking mouth nonstop. He is the poster boy for Sociopathy! And narcisscism.
    All you can do from your cell is continue with what you know best: lies and self absorption. Give it a rest Scott-you are doing life, if you receive an appeal, you’re gonna lose. No one cares about you anymore except Ma and Pa and the few weirdos that hang onto inmates for a life.
    Go Away!

  20. February 9, 2010 8:46 pm

    This comment applies to ‘faure’ & ‘Kim':

    Take your anti-American hate filled imbecility elsewhere. Scott Peterson is an innocent man, condemned to death row by very stupid people and without a trace of evidence against him. Until and unless some evidence can be found which goes to guilt AND a scenario can be proposed which makes it possible for him to be guilty (and so far none has) he remains completely innocent.

    • Casey Codorniz permalink
      March 8, 2010 9:53 am

      well insanity you do have good arguments.can u please find elvis,bruce lee,tu pac and all the others home? i really miss them!!!

      • March 8, 2010 3:22 pm

        I’ll leave the search to you. Obviously you get all of your information from websites for the mentally deranged. If you had evidence of guilt you could post it but all I see is anti-American hatred.

    • kingodd permalink
      February 26, 2012 12:20 am

      anti american? you must be a republican. when the dems tried to de-fund the war so that we could pull our kids out of harms way, the republicans said they were “anti american” because we were not giving our soldiers the proper support they needed to succeed. don’t be that guy! don’t hide behind the flag and make statements that have no relevance. as far as sp is concerned, i would think that he is guilty, but don’t know. i wasn’t in the courtroom. also, at no time did i hear from the press the theory that the body was placed in the water well after dec. 24th. i did hear that because the water temp is so cold in the bay, decomposition would be slowed. there is no diret evidence that the baby was removed prior laci being placed in the bay.

      • Jim Jones permalink
        February 26, 2012 12:31 am

        Laci Peterson’s body could have been in the bay no longer than 2 weeks. In fact she could have been reduced to just bones in 24 hours. There’s no way to reconcile this with Scott being guilty since over that whole period he was all the way down in San Diego and no one can claim he would have dumped the body in the bay around April 1 or later. Since he didn’t, someone else did and thus he is innocent.

        Decomposition would not be slowed by the water temperature since fish and crabs would have attacked the body preventing decomposition.

        There is nothing but direct evidence that the baby was removed prior Laci being placed in the bay. Claims that it could “come out” in the sea are utter nonsense.

        • kingodd permalink
          February 26, 2012 12:38 am

          i must be honest….i don’t know the facts. if it is true that the body had to be dumped at a later time, then why was sp convicted? think about it…is any defense team, or 12 person jury that stupid to convict an innocent man knowing that the facts don’t support it. i’m sorry, but i am not that stupid to buy that. what are the facts here? could the body have been in the water that long? what did the experts say? what was testified in court?

  21. faure permalink
    February 10, 2010 7:31 pm

    VOI: A kind suggestion for you: have you considered hobbies or activities that would enlarge your life? You may want to try yoga or meditation, jogging, meeting new people, etc… to chill out. The intensity of your interest in some strange man you do not know borders on rabid and stressed.
    I really ‘get’ your take on Scott, but when it is said and done, your opinions about Scott will not change anything, while it is your health that suffers.
    Relax a bit. Scott’s family is working on his appeal and he may have his day. Some things are just out of our hands.
    It just seems you are disportionately invested in Scott’s innocence when in fact none of us really truly knows what happened but Scott himself. Everything else is really speculation.
    Yet, a jury of his peers found him guilty and this is very American. Out of your hands.
    Perhaps one day someone charged with a crime will be lucky and get you to be on their jury, where you will be able to use your keen skills and razor shape intellect to discern their guilt or innocence. In this way your energy and diligence would be channeled into something more productive than rather angrily and curiously defending a man who probably doesn’t give a **** about you.
    Your defense of Scott is loud and clear, but when it is presented as zealotry it is sadly, a turnoff and the majority of us just dismiss you as a relative, Scott, some tragic prison girlfriend or someone who doesn’t have much of a life.
    Just saying……

    • February 10, 2010 11:34 pm

      ‘faure’ whined: “A kind suggestion for you: have you considered hobbies or activities that would enlarge your life? You may want to try yoga or meditation, jogging, meeting new people, etc… to chill out. The intensity of your interest in some strange man you do not know borders on rabid and stressed.”

      My life is perfectly fine and I am quite calm. I merely point out, as I have done repeated, that not a single person on this planet can make a case for Peterson’s guilt based on evidence. Instead almost all of you have assumed he was guilty and then used your assumption to force the ridiculously little bits of evidence you have into some sort of twisted ‘case’ for guilt. Procrustes would be proud of you all.

      Every single piece of evidence proves Peterson is innocent – every piece.

      This case has shown yet another cleavage in this society – between those who can think and the vast majority who do not have that capability. You have clearly put yourself in the latter group.

      As for the jury, why did it take 4 juries to convict him? When has that ever happened before? Eventually they were bound to come up with 12 dullards too incompetent to render a true verdict – and that’s what they finally did. This jury convicted themselves, not Peterson. They are provably idiots.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 4:05 pm

      Maybe vos cares about JUSTICE AND INJUSTICES….and maybe he realizes that if an innocent Scott is put to death then an innocent vos could be killed…..its not just about scott.. its about much higher ideals and beliefs in what america is supposed to be and the security that we are safe in our homes and can go fishing without having to justify it to a nazi state or face death!!
      Scott Peterson is living a great American horror story…..

  22. February 10, 2010 7:59 pm

    Looks like my comment is still awaiting moderation, while comments ridiculing VOS are allowed on. Nice censorship there.

  23. February 11, 2010 1:31 am

    Yes, I did. Thanks. It does say the comment is awaiting moderation. God forbid I should put a link in the post to extend the conversation.

  24. Nicole permalink
    February 11, 2010 8:29 pm

    I agree with VOS I read everything on this case. Does it not bother anyone that the state
    just may be wrong? I know they are wrong and this case was so biased from the start, how
    could Peterson get a fair trial? The MPD and the media made sure of this with all of their
    leaks and lies IMO. I do not believe VOS is a relative of the Peterson family, just a person
    who cares about the truth and justice.

    BTW I am not some love sick groupie either I too have a very full life so……………

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 4:34 pm

      Very true! There were a string of unsolved burglaries in the neighborhood including a burglary right across the road from the Peterson home at exactly the same time laci disappeared (and interestingly enough the tracking dogs followed her scent to the road towards that house…..ive always believed she caught the burglars so they panicked and took her. in the bay, the police reported that scotts alibi was he was fishing in the bay….so of course whoever took her they put her body where her husband was supposed to be)

  25. February 11, 2010 9:10 pm

    When California Attorney General Bill Lockyer goes on television and tells a national audience the case is a slam dunk (this just after Peterson is arrested, and long before a jury is seated) I’m really not sure an unbiased jury is possible.

    From the defense motion for a new trial:

    “The Juror Questionnaires proved that the prejudgment rate for guilt would prevent the defendant from getting a fair trial in San Mateo. Therefore, a change of venue should have been granted to ensure Mr. Peterson a fair trial in this capital case.

    The evidence submitted with the change of venue motion stated that, according to the 23-page juror questionnaires, prospective jurors in San Mateo County had already served as judge, jury and executioner in this case, and had already convicted Mr. Peterson. Over ninety-six percent (96%) of potential jurors indicated that they were aware of a criminal case involving Mr. Peterson. Additionally, over fifty five percent (55%) of prospective jurors indicated that they have formed preliminary opinions about this case. Finally, and most significantly, about forty five percent (45%) of the potential jurors admitted to having prejudged Mr. Peterson guilty.

    These figures, reflecting preconceived attitudes, are significantly higher than those in Williams v. Superior Court (1983) 34 Cal.3d 584, 590, in which a writ of mandate was granted directing the trial court to grant a change of venue. In Williams, of the 117 individuals surveyed, 22.4 percent claimed they had formed opinions of the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Similarly, in People v. Williams (1989) 48 Cal.3d 1112, the Court reversed a judgment of conviction because the prejudicial pretrial publicity had denied the defendant a fair and impartial jury. There, of the 116 prospective jurors questioned, 52 percent had read or heard of the case, and only .08 percent had formed an opinion as to defendant’s guilt. The Court held that the trial court should have granted a change of venue when it was presented with a showing of extensive pretrial publicity, and when the jury selection process later corroborated the prospective jurors’ widespread familiarity with the crime.”

    &cetera, &cetera

    Peterson’s trial should have been moved to Los Angeles, San Francisco or another major metropolitan area, where people tend to understand a little better that those in authority are not always right.

  26. Daisy permalink
    February 17, 2010 11:25 am

    Sara – just let them keep their SMALL ray of hope for the murderer. FACT is, he’s going to die in prison. Then he’ll be in hell – that’s where murderers go. You can talk to people like that until you are blue in the face, and they just don’t get it, a murderer is a murderer. I’d be willing to bet they think OJ Simpson is not guilty too. While he may have walked the streets “free” for 10 years, he is exactly where he belongs now, PRISON, and once he finally dies (couldn’t be soon enough for the Brown and Goldman families), he’ll be in hell, right along with Scott. The nasty, disgusting men who think they can get away with murdering their women just cuz they are inconvenient to them will eventually burn in HELL. I’m not arguing about it anymore, SCOTT PETERSON IS EXACTLY WHERE HE BELONGS, and, he’s NOT GETTING OUT, get over it.

    • February 17, 2010 4:31 pm

      Small ray of hope? This case was one of the most disgraceful in California history. Peterson was convicted DESPITE the evidence, NOT because of it. The jury and the prosecutors should be on death row, not Scott Peterson.

      • chris ferguson permalink
        March 10, 2013 4:37 pm

        So true!!
        Check out all my other comments

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 4:10 pm

      All i ask is 1 piece of evidence……please 1 piece
      …..u should be concerned about this…what if it happened to u?

      • kingodd permalink
        March 10, 2013 4:43 pm

        there is motive, and a ton of circumstantial evidence. that is how he was convicted. what do you want? a smoking gun? there are a ton of men convicted in this manner. you know why? because usually they are ones that killed their wives. they are always the number one suspect. he may be innocent, hell, oj might be innocent, but his actions after her death told a different story. you will never get concrete physical evidence in this case because he most likely covered all of the evidence up. god knows how he killed her, or where, but i’m sure he thought about that prior to the crime.

  27. February 17, 2010 11:33 pm

    let’s get some prozac for daisy, she can’t seem to stop shouting.

  28. February 17, 2010 11:42 pm

    and yes, men do kill, abuse, maim and murder their wives. it happens all the time. i’ve been covering local news for years and there are so many domestic violence stories that don’t get covered, and something does need to be done about it. the problem is the petersons were not in a domestic violence situation, the whole case against him was a sham. no, men should not be allowed to hurt their women. and yes, they do hurt women. but here’s another thing that does happen, and it’s wrong. people do get framed, people do get scapegoated, and people do get ruined when they are innocent. check out the statistics and see how many death penalty convictions are overturned because they are bad convictions.

    if the state kills scott peterson, that will be murder. scott peterson did not murder his wife, or anyone. he cheated on her. that is all. murder is not OK no matter what, where, why, how, and who.

    and no, i’m not related to the p’s nor do i know them. i have been studying this case since last summer. i assumed he had done it, as well, back when i didn’t care. i don’t watch television and this country had much more important things to worry about than scott peterson in 2003. 9/11? iraq war? ah, the hell with it, let’s read the tabloids. no. what intrigued me, when i began reading about this case, was the astounding lack of convincing evidence. i’m still waiting to hear something that convinces me peterson is a murderer. all i have heard are facts that give me reasonable doubt, more than reasonable in my opinion.
    and besides that, those police in that town could have saved laci, they could have followed her, if they had given the time of day to evidence that pointed away from peterson, they did not follow the leads that pointed away from peterson, and in fact they covered them up.
    believe everything you see on TV and you will never figure anything out, this case needs another look. you can put all the capital letters you want in your comments, and it doesn’t make any difference to me. evidence, not opinion; facts, not innuendo. that is what a court case should be, and we the people of california have failed in this case.

    • February 18, 2010 1:06 am

      Burkey said: “and yes, men do kill, abuse, maim and murder their wives. it happens all the time.”

      Indeed, but all women aren’t innocent either. See M. Snyder’s female violence site

      • Dawn Kekel permalink
        February 19, 2010 5:47 am

        so he buys a boat, and tell’s nobody about it and goes fishing 90 miles from home on Christmas eve and tells everyone he is going to play golf. But sorry he was also planning his trip to Europe for New Years as well!
        Then much later after Laci is missing and police are searching the waters off Berkeley Marina, Scott hires a car and drives the 90 miles to the bay and sits and watches the police while they search. Why?
        There are so many holes in Petersons defense and that is why he was found guilty.
        If I was innocent I would be hankering to get up on that stand. Why didnt Scott tesify?
        He is guilty, he is where he belongs – not such a high life now hey Scott! Cheating, Lying SCUMBAG!

        • February 19, 2010 2:23 pm

          There are so many holes in Petersons defense and that is why he was found guilty.

          Rubbish. The jury guessed that he was guilty because, like you, they don”t have the intelligence to properly judge what is real evidence and what is irrelevant nonsense.

          Explain why Mrs Peterson’s underwear was worn out in the seat only. Explain why the worn remnants of the seat of the underwear were cut out. Explain how her pants could have remained tied around her waist after the removal of the fetus. That’s real evidence, not the stupid claptrap you prattle on about. You just don’t have a clue – literally.

        • chris ferguson permalink
          March 10, 2013 4:43 pm

          Thats quite a jumble of the facts…..none of it true….though im tired of typing,,

  29. February 23, 2010 9:03 pm

    A Voice Of Sanity sounds very, very angry. I agree they must be a friend or relative no matter how hard they insist they are not. No one else gets as upset and resorts to name calling and insulting other bloggers when they don’t share the same point of view.

    You can argue all you want of course, but the fact remains that SP is in San Quentin where the majority of folks believe he deserves to be. If there is another trial I personally think he will be found guilty before they can change the sheets on his cot.

    • February 24, 2010 1:39 pm

      Tell it to the hundreds of people who have been released from prison because they were found to be innocent despite the worthless ‘opinions’ of buffoons like you. As of February 24, 2010 251 people have been EXONERATED by the Innocence Project alone despite the hate filled rants of the idiots like you (including all of the fools on their juries, over 3,000 in all). Like all of your ilk you cannot make a case for guilt based on evidence.

      As for a second trial, Sharon Rocha’s lawyers told her to drop the civil suit as she had no chance of winning despite the fact that a much lower standard applies. To this date no one can point to even one piece of evidence against Peterson; every single piece of it proves his innocence.

      Another view:
      Read Hicks v Oklahoma, 447 US 3 – Conviction cannot be based on conjecture alone. The people do not have
      (1) a place of death (the indictment may come from the wrong jurisdiction);
      (2) a cause of death (“maybe she was strangled”;
      (3) a time of death (“maybe December 24th”.
      (4) a weapon of death (“maybe this or maybe that.”
      They cannot prove the corpus delicti in the fetus’s death, or make a reasoned estimate of how mature the fetus was.
      The state did not allow a highly competent forensic pathologist to testify for the defense, a pathologist who would seriously challenge both the fetus and whether it had an independent existence.
      While the state does not have to prove motive, Mr Peterson’s raunchy affair and demeanor doesn’t make him a murderer; he was convicted on moral grounds rather than evidence.
      If I remember correctly, circumstantial evidence is a powerful tool — if there is no other plausible reason to explain an occurrence. If the explanation favors the defence, the jury MUST determine it for the defense — the so-called Sanhedrin Rule, or the Golden thread.
      This points to “reasonable doubt”; a commodity too often lost is our court today. With regard to your question, could it be that the jury reached a compromise — guilty, but with a life sentence? The judge’s firing two jury members the way he did is also a wee bit questionable; could they both be holding out for acquittal?
      I agree with you that there was no evidence linking Peterson to the crime, and insufficiency of evidence will loom large in an appeal. Having not read the transcript, there might be other errors to work with.
      Today, forensic evidence must be rigorously analyzed and challenged on virtually every word. The determination of whether the fetus/baby breathed is certainly open to challenge, and it is possible that no conclusion can be made, even with the most sophisticated tests.
      Again reasonable doubt. I do not know if Peterson is de facto guilty or not: the people have not proven it to my satisfaction.

      G M Larkin MD DABFM FACFE

      Forensic Pathologist

      http://venus.soci.niu.edu/~archives/ABOLISH/dec04/0515.html

  30. February 24, 2010 1:46 pm

    “Lotsa Tails Waggin” said: Let’s not forget how he managed to find amusement and laughter at the memorial, while everyone else was somber or emassed in grief and tears.

    That’s a flat out lie and typical of the whining of the haters. I’ve seen the original picture before it was faked (I have a copy). It tells a totally different story, however the media knew truth wouldn’t sell to the sad losers who hate Scott so they faked this picture – and another one as well.

    Laci Peterson was alive when that picture was taken and so was her baby son. Thanks to people like you the MPD didn’t have to try to find her and didn’t (“Laci sightings were not a priority” – MPD). As a result both died and the guilt rests with you and those like you, not with Scott.

  31. February 24, 2010 11:46 pm

    Wow, apparently you live in a completely alternate reality. Say hello to the pigs as they fly by!

    Oh, and keep up the name calling as long as it makes you fell important !

    • February 25, 2010 12:06 am

      It takes a few hard blows in order to teach a donkey to pay attention. Apparently you need more than a few. Explain why Mrs Peterson’s underwear was worn out in the seat only. Explain how her pants could have remained tied around her waist after the removal of the fetus. Either of these on their own proves her husband innocent, and there are dozens more facts which all support this. Why did the prosecution have to spend $11 million to get a conviction? Why could they find no evidence of guilt?

      A stupid verdict, applauded by fools.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 6:00 pm

      U mean to tell me theres a picture of scott laughing/smiling? Omg, it all makes sense now, what r we waiting for??? Lets storm the prison and hang him now! A laugh nor a smile do a murderer make….

  32. JustkillinTyme permalink
    March 3, 2010 1:31 pm

    I’m only interested in one FACT, and it cannot be disputed: the jury found this murdering pig GUILTY and that’s a FACT.

    • March 8, 2010 3:17 pm

      Hundreds of men and women have been found guilty and later released. That means that all of those juries were wrong. No surprise – these are people too dumb to get out of jury duty.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 6:06 pm

      They sure did and they should be ashamed of themselves…. in interviews several have admitted that most if not all of them went into the trial with their mind made up….i watched the trial with an open mind and day after day it became more and more obvious that scott was not just innocent but that it was physically IMPOSSIBLE fot him to be guilty

  33. March 3, 2010 6:40 pm

    I so agree JKT. The appeals will begin soon (around 2011) and there is of course a possibility the verdict will be overturned and the case will have to be tried again. If that happens I stand by my earlier prediction that the scumbag will go down faster than it will take to change his cot linens.

    • March 8, 2010 3:19 pm

      There’s no chance of another conviction. All of the ‘evidence’ has been double checked since the trial and the breadth and depth of the lies so many witnesses told is horrific. No man should ever be convicted with rubbish and lies like this.

  34. March 8, 2010 3:26 pm

    Casey Codorniz drooled: “95% of americans believe scott is guilty.there are a few pinheads out there who think he is innocent!!!”

    About 98% of Americans can’t think so you are claiming many, even amongst the truly dull, think him innocent! Certainly all of the smart people who have looked at the case see it as a gross miscarriage of justice.

  35. obviously insane permalink
    April 5, 2010 12:02 pm

    Oh how amusing to sit and read all the comments posted by someone as sane as A Voice of Sanity. Thanks to him/her (most likely a her…a Scott groupie) reading all the transcripts of the case, he/she REALLY knows the facts here. How could the rest of us possibly believe Scott was guilty?! Silly us!!!

    • April 5, 2010 12:51 pm

      When Laci was abducted she was 7 1/2 months pregnant.

      Cyril H. Wecht, M.D., J.D., is a forensic pathologist, attorney and medical-legal consultant. He is one of the country’s leading forensic pathologists. He examined the body of Conner Peterson. He measured it and he states that it was a full term fetus. This means that Scott Peterson is innocent.

      Dr. Henry Lee is Chief Emeritus of the Connecticut State Police, Founder and Professor of the Forensic Science Program at the University of New Haven, Editor of Seven Academic Journals, author/ co-author of 30 books and over 300 articles. He examined the body of Conner Peterson. He measured it and he states that it was a full term fetus. This means that Scott Peterson is innocent.

      So, do I take the word of two of the most famous forensic scientists in the country or the word of you, a fool who can’t even put a simple argument together and hasn’t the slightest evidence to back your worthless opinions up? Not a hard choice.

  36. April 5, 2010 5:12 pm

    Let’s not forget that the “honorable?” Cyril Wecht is also on trial for fraud!

    Voice of Insanity is living up to his/her insanity by believing whom he CHOOSES to believe – not whom the court of law and jurors believed. The fact that 2 defense witnesses stated that Conner was full term is no surprise; that is why they are called defense witnesses.

    You can hem and haw all you want, if there was real concrete evidence that had come to light proving that the SOB was innocent, it would be all over the news. You got nothing.

  37. April 5, 2010 6:40 pm

    Dr. Allison Galloway was a witness for the prosecution. She was also the only witness who testified using peer-reviewed, established science, to show the age and development of Conner Peterson.

    That the jury did not understand this testimony is one reason they did not acquit Peterson. One juror did understand the testimony, the doctor/lawyer who asked to be removed from the jury because he was afraid for his safety. He tried to explain to the other jurors the significance of this testimony and they did not want to hear it.

    Let me repeat, Galloway was a witness for the prosecution. If you are going to make assertions without the benefit of understanding the significance of the testimony–that it came from the prosecution’s side–then your comments are useless.

  38. April 5, 2010 6:52 pm

    “I Kill Dogs for Fun” said “Let’s not forget that the “honorable?” Cyril Wecht is also on trial for fraud!”

    LIE! The jury failed to agree on the insanely complicated ‘case’. And then :

    “On September 6, 2008, a federal appeals court took the rare step of removing District Judge Arthur J. Schwab from the case for “a reduced level of rancor.” On September 18, Wecht’s defense team announced a plan to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to consider all dismissing charges against Dr. Wecht to avert a second trial. The government sought to retry Wecht on 14 charges.

    On May 14, 2009, the new trial judge dismissed most of the evidence against Wecht because it was seized under illegal and improperly executed search warrant. On June 2, 2009, U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan announced that her office would be filing a motion to dismiss all charges against Dr. Wecht, effectively ending the government’s prolonged battle with the ex-coroner and clearing Dr. Wecht of all charges. ”

    NOTE: “… clearing Dr. Wecht of all charges.”

    Mary Beth Buchanan has been heavily criticized for her behavior in a number of cases.

    The fact remains that every competent witness testified under oath that the baby was a full term baby. That means SCOTT PETERSON IS INNOCENT

  39. obviously insane permalink
    April 5, 2010 7:38 pm

    This is so sad, Voice of Sanity. Your “knowledge” of the case clearly shows that you need to get a life or at the very least, perhaps, get on with the life you have. Make no mistake… I did not attempt to “put an argument together”. That would be silly, don’t ya think? Why would I do that? The prosecution did that. Years ago. The defense tried to rebut. The jury deliberated. The case is over. Period. There’s no need to put an argument together. That’s why I can’t figure out why YOU are? I was merely trying to point out how ridiculous you’re being but the more that you continue, the more I question whether or not you’re even serious. My guess is that you’re trying to get a rise out of everyone. I get it… good one!

    • April 5, 2010 8:06 pm

      > “I did not attempt to “put an argument together”. The prosecution did that. ”

      No, they didn’t. They assumed the case the defense would offer and, instead of proving THEIR CASE, they spent the entire trial trying to disprove the defense case and the actual evidence.

      > “The defense tried to rebut.”

      The defense destroyed the prosecution over and over.

      > “The jury deliberated.”

      They admitted that they didn’t bother. Whatever Nancy Grace said was good enough for them once they kicked the jurors off who had a brain — or a conscience.

      > “The case is over.”

      It will be over when a competent court of appeals tosses it out as the absolutely ludicrous pile of crap it was. Then you can get on your belly and beg Scott for forgiveness.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 6:13 pm

      Im not going to waste my time except to say, u fool u fool its not just about Scott, its about INJUSTICE!

  40. obviously insane permalink
    April 5, 2010 10:31 pm

    Sanity, you spoke to everything except for the part about getting on with your life. You sound like a smart enough person. I just can’t figure out why you’re wasting time on this one. I’m sure there are truly innocent people in jail that you could try to save. Best of luck to you helping out your buddy Scott. I sit on the edge of my seat as I await the results of that.

    • April 5, 2010 10:56 pm

      Most of my time I spend debating other things. This takes no time at all. I’m fascinated to see how many people, such as yourself, feel it’s OK for them to have an opinion while they know none of the facts. I guess that explains G W Bush being elected – twice!

      “Only two things are infinite, the universe, and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.”
      — Albert Einstein

  41. April 20, 2010 11:37 am

    If they want to raise money in the name of Scott they should have a auction to put the needle in his arm. I would bid high to put the scumbag to death. he will never see Laci or hos son from hell.

    • April 20, 2010 12:22 pm

      Why is ‘SG’, an obvious America hater, commenting on this case? And why does it claim that Laci and Conner are in hell?

      • kingodd permalink
        February 26, 2012 12:26 am

        there you go again with the anti american bullshit. what does that have to do with forming an opinion? oh yeah…it doesn’t jive with yours

        • Jim Jones permalink
          February 26, 2012 2:43 am

          “think about it…is any defense team, or 12 person jury that stupid to convict an innocent man knowing that the facts don’t support it.”

          The jury admitted that they couldn’t see any motive and couldn’t see facts leading to guilt but instead convicted him because he didn’t cry in court – after they were told clearly to ignore that. They also admitted that without the removal of 3 jurors, 2 during deliberations, they would not have been able to convict him. “Jury Survivor” is not a process permitted by the rules.

          The fourth jury was once described as “The 12 dumbest hillbillies in Redwood City”. I can’t fault that.

          Throughout the trial record, the senility of the judge is clear.

          The defense did a very poor job despite the high fees they were paid. Not California’s finest hour.

        • kingodd permalink
          February 26, 2012 9:09 am

          i read the autopsy report last night and it backs up what i thought. there was very little flesh left on the body. “months spent in the water” the baby’s body was in better condition because he was protected against the elements being in her womb. also, mark geragos is one of the top defense lawyers in the country. i doubt he would let such an injustice happen.

        • Jim Jones permalink
          February 26, 2012 2:45 am

          “… anti american bullshit.”

          You hate Americans for no good reason.

          America is Americans.

          Therefore you hate America.

        • kingodd permalink
          February 26, 2012 9:00 am

          homeland security, and the patriot act are anti-american, but i would bet you support them both

  42. June 2, 2010 3:29 pm

    ‘ Jorge’ ranted: “His baby was not full term. Period. Find one independently verifiable source that says differently. You are simply lying. I have read the autopsy for both bodies.”

    Every competent witness who testified said he was full term. Dr Cyril Wecht and Dr Henry Lee examined the body and confirmed it. The only one who said different was Dr Devore and he relied on Jeanty for his claim. P. Jeanty (Devore’s reference), F. Rodesch, D. Delbeke and J. E. Dumont say that his bone measuring method is an unreliable method (Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 3, Issue 2 75-79).

    Also:

    “That Doctor DeVore is trying to sell junk science to the jury. His opinion here is not based on fact, not based on personal observation, and not even based on a valid set of statistics. Given the estimate of a fetal age is based on several parameters such as weight (not possible here), length (probably not possible here) and ossification centers (that may be possible, but with a wide variation), all estimates have to be iffy. Each fetus grows at a different rate; for example, my second son was born at about six month’s gestation, weighed just under 1 kilogram but was 55 cm long. Other fetuses can also display anomalous parameters.

    Where did this “expert” come up with the conclusion that he use an “average” of two or three estimates, and come up with a conclusion to even a reasonable medical possibility (note that the law requires a “reasonable medical certainty” in most states, and a reasonable medical “probability” in other states) in all medical opinions. If California follows Daubert, his testimony would be laughed out of court. It would be hard to accept even under FRE section 700 and following.

    The prosecution here must be desperate to try to get in such raunchy evidence. As it stands now, we will never know who killed Ms Peterson unless there is a confession. First the Simpson case, now this circus; what has happened to the courts in California?”

    G M Larkin MD

    FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST

    http://venus.soci.niu.edu/~archives/ABOLISH/oct04/2938.html

  43. September 16, 2010 9:15 pm

    “Joke” ranted: “You seem to know the exact date the bodies were dumped- that being April 13th- and yet in your post dated June 2, 2010, you seem to be saying that the body had been in the bay for 111 days.”

    I’m comparing the reality with the ridiculous claims of the prosecution. THEY claimed the bodies were in the bay for 111 days. That’s a forensic impossibility.

    “Joke” whined further: “Oh, and by the way, the body couldn’t have been dumped the night of April 13th because Conner’s poor little body was found the day of the 13th. Oops!”

    It was found around 4:30pm. That almost certainly means that it was dumped in the early morning hours of April the 13th as it would have eventually been found and attacked by scavengers otherwise if not by humans. It’s slightly possible the insane woman who killed them both dumped the bodies during the day on the 13th but anyone with a functioning neuron would know to do it at night. No one with any common sense would dump the bodies in daytime.

    “Mark Geragos: Now, in addition to that, the, you said, is it my understanding that this location where the baby was found is a couple of hundred yards away from the path, a path that’s there?
    Tod Opdyke: Yes. There’s a asphalt-type or paved path.
    Mark Geragos: Can you point that to the jury where the path is on 98 A?
    Tod Opdyke: Yes.
    Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, that path, is that frequented by bicyclists, joggers, walkers?
    Tod Opdyke: It is. It’s heavily, heavily traveled.
    Mark Geragos: Okay. And that’s used by the general public, is that correct?
    Tod Opdyke: It is. It’s a public shoreline.”

    Laci’s body was almost certainly dumped on the same trip but into the water, not placed on the shore. She was found about 11:10, 11:15 a.m on the 14th and her body showed signs of water immersion for about 24 hours.

    Obviously all of this eliminates Scott no matter how you spin it.

    • Joke Teller permalink
      September 16, 2010 11:33 pm

      If the body was found the DAY of April 13th, it couldn’t possibly have been dumped THAT night, duh!

      Sanity, do you know the woman who did this to Laci? I wonder where I was when it was discovered that a WOMAN dumped her body! You should take this information straight to the police!!!

  44. November 7, 2010 1:18 pm

    A voice of sanity needs to get a life!
    The dude (scott peterson) is a lying douchebag of a sociopath. Who cares about him anyways?
    God knows the truth and whether Scott pays for his crime in this world doesn’t really matter as he will be judged by God for eternity.

    • November 7, 2010 2:49 pm

      I have a life. I also have a brain. You? Not so much.

      If people are to get the death penalty for lying, why not Ted Haggard? Or G W Bush?

  45. mass permalink
    December 8, 2010 2:42 pm

    How can a convicted murderer on death row be permitted to be on a computer?

  46. dena permalink
    December 24, 2010 7:25 pm

    Fact is a very beautiful young mother to be was killed and her husband was having an affair at the time made him a number one suspect. It all came down to lies and more lies loving husband cheating and telling half truth to family and friends and most damages was his conscious contact with his amor by phone. Yet no reasonable doubt that he was the one responsible . ” FREEDOM ” from marriage and children was the motive. The call’s from those who claim—- they saw a women matching Laci and her dog walking in a park close to home. A burglary , a woman being heckle , a speeding van or kidnapping near a park made by a peace officer , possible contact with people whom may have motive to harm her, ex felon’s not wanting to return to prison . No Doubt – Really ??????????.

  47. January 27, 2011 3:51 pm

    “Anne” said: “Anyone who believes that Laci & Conner were BOTH alive past 12/24/02 hasn’t read much of what was going on.”

    They’re the ONLY people who have read the facts in detail.

    “Anne” said: ” To anyone who even would suggest that Laci died in March of 2003, needs to spend some time reading things, talking perhaps to the CORNONER who examined that poor young mom, and if you remember it was noted that Conner was born in what was termed a COFFIN BIRTH….* ( means his little body was EXSPELLED from his mother AFTER HER DEATH.”

    Ignorance, your name is Anne. If by ‘coroner’ you mean the medical examiner, Dr B Peterson, he said that Conner was a full term baby. That means he lived through January and most of February.

    And he DIDN’T say it was a “coffin birth”. He came up with a crackpot theory which has no basis in science.

    However Dr Peterson DID testify to facts that prove Laci lived for several weeks after her abduction. Explain why Mrs Peterson’s underwear was worn out in the seat only. Explain how her pants could have remained tied around her waist after the removal of the fetus. Either of these on their own proves her husband innocent, and there are dozens more facts which all support this.

    “Anne” said: “Get a life, grow up, and realize that the person you believe is innocent is not only guilty, but one of the country’s best liars.”

    No, the best liar was Distaso. He lied more than once in his closing and wasn’t caught. Runner up was Al Brocchini. He lied more than once in his testimony in court but was caught doing it. He was never prosecuted for perjury.

    Scott Peterson NEVER TESTIFIED IN COURT. Therefore any “lies” he told about his little sex fling (four ‘dates’) are irrelevant. Every police officer testified under oath that Scott always told them the truth.

    You’re a dull child, aren’t you?

  48. February 9, 2011 1:40 am

    Take it easy VOS. I don’t think they’re listening (or reading with an open mind). I’ve discovered that people who believe in Peterson’s innocence exist in another dimension entirely from those who are rabid (yes, rabid—talk about needing a life) about his guilt.

    Very weird to see people saying the things they say about looking forward to him being killed, stick the needle in, it’s pretty sick, actually.

    That’s another reason this case fascinates me, because it’s a litmus test of sorts on how people think…meanwhile I’m still reading about it, and if I see something that makes me think he did it, then I’ll acknowledge it–but so far the evidence is pretty unimpressive.
    Cheating is wrong, but lying about cheating is common. It doesn’t mean the person is a killer. The officers who took the stand at Peterson’s trial admitted he told the truth and cooperated fully. Something not reported very much in the press.
    OK VOS, I’ll leave it to you. By the way folks, the Petersons do have a website and supporters, people who have followed the case and are concerned that such a low standard of proof could put a person on death row. It’s not even about Scott P. so much as it’s about our justice system.

    And it’s a really important thing to know about our justice system–that this kind of thing can happen, that is, trial by press with the victim’s family giving a verdict long before the trial even happens, and so forth. It’s definitely worth studying and anyone commenting here about it is automatically disqualified from saying “get a life” because you’re commmenting about it too.

  49. teachermom permalink
    June 29, 2011 11:46 pm

    VOS; Please try to refrain from hateful comments and name-calling to those posters who disagree with you. It is an immediate turn off and prevents the reader from wanting to continue to “hear” you. I came upon this site from a link and will not visit it again so I will not be affected by a name-call I expect will probably result from my post based on those I’ve read. You can respond to someone’s post without insulting them…….or can you? Food for thought, but I don’t think you are hungry for others’ points of view.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 6:24 pm

      Go f urself!! In the a why dont u teach!

  50. crystal colion permalink
    August 1, 2011 8:34 pm

    the said thing is they have more freedom locked up than we do out her we pay their rent bills pay for their food all because they cant control themselves. we can pay for the killers rappist and theves but we can pay for the homeless who r to old or disabled sad isnt it. what about the kids who live n the streets because their mothers or fathers cant get a job. lets keep turning or backs on them and keep the offender healthy and well feed. we need to rethink the issue an do something about this.

  51. van permalink
    November 5, 2011 7:32 am

    Scott is innocent, why the Jury’s did not think so..

    Lets see. This case was not base upon physical evidence. In fact, it was told that this case wasn’t base on physical evidence. So if there wasn’t much evidence in this case then why did he got convicted? It is true that this is a circumstantial case, a strong circumstantial case. Not base upon physical evidence.
    Lets not forget Circumstantial are the strongest evidence needed.
    Let say for instinct that if you have a friend in your house and are certain that he is the only one in the house of the time being and something went missing from the time he is there and left. Who do you think steal from you? 99.99999 percent of the time the finger is pointed to your friend. But do you have any physical evidence that he stole your stuff? Beyond reasonable doult, there is a chance that he is innocent. So thats where the investigation comes in. Lets investigate before you draw into conclusion. Lets do all the investigation needed before you decided that he took it and not assume that he did. Lets give your friend a fair trial and to be heard. and then you decide for yourself. I think that is very fair for your friend. At least he got a chance to prove his innocent.
    In scott peterson case, his got the chance to prove that he is innocent. However due to overwhelming circumstantial evidence and 11 million dollars of investigation funds that the state spend to prove that he was guilty…He is guilty in the eyes of the law and have gotten a fair trial. Unless proven otherwise…Just my 2 cents!

    • Jim Jones permalink
      January 1, 2012 11:40 pm

      “Due to overwhelming circumstantial evidence”.

      All of the overwhelming circumstantial evidence proved he was innocent. The state admitted they had no evidence of guilt.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 6:31 pm

      Ur 2 cents didn’t amount to a hill of beans….back to the hippy commune with u…
      Oh by the way, SCOTT IS INNOCENT!

  52. lona permalink
    January 1, 2012 11:24 pm

    There are many people in the US that don’t have a penny to their name and most live HOMELESS Shelters. But the tax payers continue to pay for Criminals housing! They get a free education and internet!! We keep hearing how our States, counties and Country are struggling. Myself and others don’t have cable, live paycheck to paycheck, and have a hard time just getting by.

    Connor and Laci are the victims, not Scott Peterson!! Those that choose to send him money and marriage proposals, beware you might be his next victim. How would these people feel if this happened to their loved on.

    • Jim Jones permalink
      January 1, 2012 11:39 pm

      He’s never hurt anyone so you couldn’t be his “next victim”. When he is released you can apologize to him.

      • lona permalink
        January 2, 2012 12:19 am

        Why would I need to apologize to him?

        • Jim Jones permalink
          January 2, 2012 12:42 am

          Well “loner for a reason”, you need to apologize for insulting an innocent man. But a sad loser like you doesn’t have the guts.

      • lona permalink
        January 2, 2012 12:29 am

        sorry JIM JONES, I wouldn’t give him the time of day. “his next victim?” HI SP

    • lona permalink
      January 2, 2012 12:08 am

      Please read my statement again, VOICE OF INSANITY ooops Sanity. If it is a family member, a friend or SP himself, this is a good reason for not having the access to the internet. I still can’t believe that they have this ability. Where prisoners didn’t have much to do but WRITE letters and read. They don’t deserve education, and ability to have things other don’t have in the real world. LETS STOP SPENDING MONEY ON KEEPING THESE LOW LIFES ALIVE!!

      • Jim Jones permalink
        January 2, 2012 12:42 am

        OK, “loner for a reason”, you go into prison his place. You deserve it, he doesn’t.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 10, 2013 6:35 pm

      They are all 3 victims! Scott however lost the most and is still paying…..

  53. Jim Jones permalink
    February 26, 2012 2:44 pm

    kingodd: “i read the autopsy report last night and it backs up what i thought. there was very little flesh left on the body.”

    After 2 weeks there would have been just bones and no baby – and not a full term baby. The Evelyn Hernandez case confirms this. Clearly both Laci and Conner lived long after Dec 24th which makes Peterson innocent.

    I’d post a link but the system here seizes if you do. Google for (voice of sanity three witnesses innocence)

  54. Rob permalink
    March 4, 2012 2:34 am

    Scott is innocent I tell you. So is Dr. Jeffrey McDonald and OJ Simpson! Sure they were cheats and liars. No one would dispute that. That doesn’t make them murderers! They were rascals, sure…but basically solid citizens who were railroaded by the system….jeez.

    • Jim Jones permalink
      March 4, 2012 3:10 am

      OJ? We’ll never know since the state screwed up the evidence.
      Jeffrey McDonald? Pretty much the same thing plus junk science and BS.
      Scott Peterson? 5 month trial with no evidence of guilt, plenty of evidence of innocence.

      • kingodd permalink
        March 4, 2012 1:03 pm

        how can you say “no” evidence of guilt? i can understand using the term very little, but no evidence?

        • Jim Jones permalink
          March 4, 2012 2:33 pm

          It’s true. As I said, I’d post a link but the system here seizes if you do. Google for (voice of sanity three witnesses innocence) and read that one post.

          The fact that Scott was doing the massage therapist (and which of us hasn’t) is no more important than that he likes marmalade on his breakfast toast (and which of us doesn’t), and the same applies to all of the so called ‘evidence’.

          More compelling is that the prosecutor was forced to lie to the jury repeatedly in his closing. He lied about every item that he claimed was actual evidence – every piece. Why isn’t that all you need to know?

        • kingodd permalink
          March 4, 2012 2:49 pm

          i dont who you are. i wasnt at the trial. just because you say it doesn’t make it true

        • chris ferguson permalink
          March 10, 2013 6:38 pm

          NO EVIDENCE!!!! Ive challenged virtually everyone on here to provide 1 piece of evidence and so far no one has….how about u big boy?
          Please give 1 piece….

        • kingodd permalink
          March 10, 2013 6:47 pm

          lets see…a strand of laci’s hair found in pliers on the boat….the casting marks for the 4 missing anchors…then a bunch of circumstantial evidence

        • chris ferguson permalink
          March 11, 2013 3:30 pm

          Haha! What a joke! “Lots of circumstantial evidence “…uh in other words NO EVIDENCE! U cant even remember the bs…..as for ONE hair in a pair of pliers….omg that proves NOTHING!! Except at some point in time laci used the pliers for something or that some how at some time scott got a hair on himself from laci who he lives with and had close physical contact with and then he used the pliers and the hair got transferred to them…..no proof of any wrong doing….matter of fact that 1 hair SCREAMS at the complete lack of forensic evidence. And the “anchors”, again no proof, and i dont remember what scott said but i seem to recall them being very innocently explained away. So i still ask for just 1 piece of proof

        • kingodd permalink
          March 11, 2013 4:12 pm

          like i said…a single hair was presented as evidence, as well as casting marks for anchors that he made that were never found. those two items were given as physical evidence you twit! you asked the question, i answered it. was the single hair used as physical evidence in the trial or not? if you say no…you are a liar. here’s the deal…you wont find any physical evidence because he lived with her and had time to cover it up. the problem the defense has IS THE LACK OF EVIDENCE because there are no witnesses to her abduction, no crime scene, no fight. 85% of people killed, are killed by someone they know. scotts actions (lies after lie, an affair, trying to flee the country) all work against him as circumstantial evidence. the jury decided he was guilty based on circumstantial evidence, and motive, which they are entitled to do. there have been numerous men put behind bars for the exact same crime without any physical evidence. is he guilty? i dont know, i didn’t sit on the jury, nor did you, but that is our justice system. being that he had one of the top trial lawyers in the country defending him (and the jury still found him guilty) i will trust the jury’s decision.

  55. Rob permalink
    March 4, 2012 10:44 am

    Man oh man…they are out there…a small but vocal minority of odd balls who believe in these worthless creeps in the face of strong circumstantial and physical evidence. Juries sit for days, weeks, and months listening to the evidence. Judges review the facts and yet these minority coo-coos know better.
    OJ…”we’ll never know.” True…the coo-coo minority will never accept anything less than a unatainable perfect case where every policeman, investigator, judge, and juror acted perfectly and every piece of evidence lines up perfectly too, 30 year law enforcement officer here…hello?…in the real world there are NO cases that arent messed up. The reality is that they are all messed up to either a slight degree or a great degree. However, objective, common sense jurors, and fact reviewers are able to accept that we live in a real world while the coo-coo minority types latch onto any imperfection they can find and beat it to death; clutching to the imperfect policeman, investigator, juror, judge, or any doubtful piece of evidence as if it were their Holy Grail.
    OJ Simpson – guilty as hell as the majority of common sense folks that matter know. A review of the case, although not perfect, leads any reasonable person to conclude beyonf a reasonable doubt,,,based on the totality of the facts, circumstances, and not turning a “blind eye” to the defendant’s typical self-damning statements, actions, and behaviors of a guilty man. Notice I said “reasonable doubt” which is the standard for convictions. To a one; the coo-coos are always looking for a case to be proved beyond a “shadow of a doubt” – practically an impossible standard to achieve.
    Jeffrey McDonald – same as above,
    Scott PETERSON – SAME THING.

    I’ve read everything I could get my hands on concerning the above cases, Three things are certain,
    1) These men are all guilty of murder.
    2) The coo-ccos (usually friends and family members) will forever beat to death that “imperfect” statement or piece or evidence or unanswered question (to thier satisfaction). In the OJ case, the glove was a bit too small…forget about all the evidence of past abuse, the defendant’s cut hand, the defendant’s own blood inter-mingled with the victims and found on the scene. Hey we have an imperfection OVER HERE: A policeman used the “N” word! Holy cow, folks. Tainted case. He’s innocent!
    In the McDonald case, there was an unexplained blond hair found on the crime scene and a female nut who took the blame for the murders. Forget about a mountain of guilty behavior before and after the killings. Forget about the defendants lies as to intruders in his home and the victim’s blood evidence not squaring with the defendant’s concocted story. Hey we have an imperfection OVER HERE. LOOK OVER HERE! Hey, some policemen walked around the crime scene and blemished a otherwise “perfect case”. Tainted case. He’s innocent!
    In the Scott Peterson case, there is contradictory expert opinions about the timeline.Forget about a mountain of guilty behavior before and after the killings. Forget about the lies Scott told about going golfing, his dodgey behavior, and his appearance at a fishing dock not terribly far from where his wife and kid were eventually recovered. Of all places, what are the chances. It’s one helluva coincidence most reasonable people would say. Not the coo-coos…oh no…not close enough for them. Does anyone have the feeling that no distance could be close enough for the coo-coos?

    Interesting that all three of these jokers were fooling around on their wives (ex-wife in OJ’s case) yet they all loved them dearly. Is there anyone out there who shows their love by being faithful? Anyhow, its also curious, that all of these guys never did very much to sincerely help in the search for the “real killers”. To the contrary, they all more or less ducked out from helping to find the one they loved so much.

    3) They will all spend the majority of remaining years of their lives rotting in jail for their crimes because the majority of reasonable people matter more than the minority of coo-coos, Thank God.

    • Jim Jones permalink
      March 4, 2012 2:37 pm

      You have just proved H L Mencken correct: most people are too stupid to live (and you are their king). All you do is repeat crap you heard from people no smarter than you. In that long rant I see only drivel; not one thing original to you, not one original thought. That’s because you have never had one.

      Here’s my reply to the “mountain of evidence” claim all morons repeat: quote one single piece of the ‘mountain’.

      Dunning & Kruger are right.

  56. kingodd permalink
    March 4, 2012 1:08 pm

    well said

  57. Jim Jones permalink
    March 4, 2012 3:06 pm

    kingodd ranted: “i dont who you are. i wasnt at the trial. just because you say it doesn’t make it true”

    Wow that’s pathetic. Yes, it DOES make it true because I quote actual experts and actual research and the trial record. You quote morons.

    I’m right so I win.

    • kingodd permalink
      March 4, 2012 3:45 pm

      you quote yourself, therefore you are a moron. i guess you didn’t drink enough kool-aid

      • Jim Jones permalink
        March 4, 2012 7:07 pm

        I quote the leading experts in the field. I trust the opinions of, for example, a world renowned expert such as Dr Henry Lee. I laugh at your crap which is mere ignorance.

  58. Rob permalink
    March 4, 2012 6:34 pm

    I quote only drivel? Please correct me, enlightended coo-coo. I’m all ears:

    Find the erroneous statements and misinterpretations from my earlier statements:

    Forget about the lies Scott told about going golfing, his dodgey behavior, and his appearance at a fishing dock not terribly far from where his wife and kid were eventually recovered. Of all places, what are the chances. It’s one helluva coincidence most reasonable people would say.

    Reality check: Guilty people tend to exhibit guilty behavior. The jury obviously used their common sense in deducing that going fishing on Christmas eve to a Marina almost 90 miles away was one of many pieces of circumstantial evidence of guilty behavior. I say one of many because when you pile on the lies that this man told as transcripts to Frey illustrate, it adds up to a mountain of circumstancial evidence to most common sense people. Thats all powerful circumstantial evidence of guilt, of course, easily dismissed by coo-coos as either insignificant or explained away by some really off the wall rationalization.

    Next, he appears at a fishing dock where his wife and child were later found not far from. Okay, so the missing wife and child weren’t found in a ditch, in a car trunk, in a forest, or a rockpit, or a hotel room….am I correct so far? I think I have read more than the average person regarding this case that would include some transcripts of court testimony as well as taped statements, so correct me where I’m wrong. The bodies turn up after being washed up from the bay…not far from where Peterson drove 90 miles from his home to go fishing on Christmas Eve.

    Well, well…its something the coo-coos don’t like to hear, but the odds of this happening are really astromical. Don’t even worry about that Peterson is a proven liar, cheat, and adulter…(if I am wrong about that, please correct me). Don’t worry about that he calls Amber Frey days after the disappearance of his wife and is recorded to have said a bunch of lies and to have had a discussion about things that a man worried sick over his missing wife would never have had….(if I am wrong about that, please correct me). This is powerful evidence of guilty behavior. But never mind about that. Peterson was later arrested and found in addition to other items with approximately $15,000 in cash, camping equipment, a water purifier, multiple credit cards belonging to various members of his family, several changes of clothing, a MapQuest map to Frey’s workplace, Viagra, and his brother’s driver license….(if I am wrong about that, please correct me). This is powerful evidence of guilty behavior. But never mind about that. His hair and goatee had been dyed blond. But never mind about that. Like Jeffery McDonald and OJ Simspon, he never really led the charge to assist in finding his missing wife that he loved so much he was calling his mistress days after her disappearance…..(if I am wrong about that, please correct me). This is powerful evidence of guilty behavior. But never mind about that.

    To me and the people that matter in the hearing of the circumstancial and physical evidence this stuff matters…alot. To most common sense folks and to a jury who obviously based their verdict on circumstantial evidence that came out during the trial, from the location of Laci Peterson’s body to the numerous, numerous lies that Scott told after her disappearance it added up to a “mountain of evidence” and obviously enough to convict him beyond any reasonable doubt. Not beyond a shadow of a doubt, which is not the standard, but beyond any reasonable doubt.

    Again, apart from the constant lying, cheating, and overall guilty behavior, the circumstantial evidence of the disappearance of the mother and her body being discovered so close to the bay where Scott drove 90 miles on Christmas Eve to fish is more than enough for a reasonable person to conclude he committed the murder. Sorry, but for reasonable, objective minds that adds up to a “mountain of proof” beyond a reasonable doubt. To others, friends, family members, coo-coos….well, no amount of proof could ever be sufficient.

    • Jim Jones permalink
      March 4, 2012 7:11 pm

      None of this is evidence, but sadly it is clear you are too dull witted to know the difference.

      I’ll give you a chance to prove you aren’t terminally stupid: explain the state of Laci Peterson’s underwear.

      This was the actual trial testimony since you are too dull witted to use Google:

      Dr. Brian Peterson, state pathologist, witness for the prosecution.

      David Harris, lawyer, prosecuting Scott Peterson.

      Brian Peterson: There was a portion of khaki colored trousers in place. And inside the waistband of those there was a brand name of Motherhood. On the laundry label there was a size S. I took to mean small. There were panties beneath the trousers. The brand on those was Jockey, and the size was 7. The buttock portion of the panties was missing. Part of the elastic band around each leg was still in place. With respect to further examination of the trousers, there was a button closure in the front that was still fastened. There was a zipper that was still in place. And in the waistband of the trousers there were draw cords. And those were still in place too.

      David Harris: Again, let me go to each, you are talking about these items were in place. Were they in the usual place of wearing?

      Brian Peterson: They were.

      David Harris: That would include the underwear as well?

      Brian Peterson: That’s correct.

      David Harris: You can continue.

      Brian Peterson: The crotch portion of the trousers was shredded, and had been basically reduced to a number of tangled fibers. To my eye, within these fibers, were a number of round to oval stony deposits, mineral deposits. These were materials that I also saw on the x-rays. So that was actually within the fibers remaining of the pants. The front of the panties was also intact. As I said, the rear portion was missing. The front was still intact, along with the bands around the legs. And that was basically it in terms of clothing.

      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

      My comment:
      This sort of wear is only caused by time. So we are either to believe that Laci Peterson, a woman known for trying for perfection, put on a completely worn out pair of underwear that evening to go out, or, that someone undressed her, changed her underwear for a worn out pair and then redressed her. It is much easier to conclude the obvious, that Laci Peterson wore these out herself over a period of weeks. Since the outer pants showed no such wear this could not have happened in the sea by ‘rubbing against rocks’ or similar. Clearly this one piece of evidence alone eliminates her husband.

      Further, the fact that the seat was completely gone while the front was intact shows that extended wear took place over a long period. That can only suggest that Laci had no other underwear to use. This is conclusive proof that Laci survived long enough for Conner to grow in size and, as he was a full term baby, proof that eliminates her husband.

  59. Rob permalink
    March 4, 2012 8:26 pm

    As I stated before, 30 plus years in law enforcement. It is you who do not understand evidence. There are three types: real, circumstantial, and direct. What was stated, the lies, guilty behavior, etc. go to circumstantial which although many lay people feel is the weakest type of evidence, is often the most reliable and strong. Lay people like to dismiss this evidence for forensic evidence (largely due to CSI and other TV shows they watch).

    As to you name calling, I’m quite certain that you wouldn’t be talking to me like that in person, so why would you use the internet to communicate in this manner?

    Understand that when one expresses themselves in the way that you do, others tend to regard them as ignorant and cowardly.
    The result is that your comments tend to be ignored, even if your point of view may actually have some merit.

    Hiding behind the internet and casting insults? C’mon now, only pimply-faced punks do that.

    Back to the forensic evidence you say is conclusive proof which eliminates her husband – that is a piece of evidence that is something that an expert witness for the defense and the prosecution can debate and hypothesize as to how that occurred. It is not obviously conclusive proof as Scott sits in jail as of this moment. It is simply a piece of forensic evidence that is the subject of hypothesizing and debate by experts. The fact that this unanswered question troubles you proves nothing except that any criminal case is not without flaws, unanswered questions, and room for argument. The fallacy that a murder case must be proved “beyond a shadow of a doubt and every question answered is another common misconception to those outside of the legal field.

    The jury, has the final word as to how much weight to give the evidence and the expert testimony. The jury also has the final word as to how much weight to give the circumstantial evidence such as a defendant that drives to a a fishing dock on Xmas Eve, the same day as his wife disappears, and after he returns she is later found not far from the site of his fishing expedition. The jury obviously gave great weight to these circumstances that were only worsened by the defendants numerous lies, cheating with a mistress, and his guilty behavior after the disappearance. Things like purchasing a porn channel and calling his mistress. If it makes you feel good that you “solved” the case based on your example of forensic evidence, fine. The jury didn’t buy it. They reason that the forensic evidence was not conclusive and discounted it. They more likely used their common sense and experience to reason that guilty people to not behave the way that Scott Peterson did during and after the time of the murder and that the odds of a missing wife to turn up murdered in the close proximity of her husband’s boat trip was circumstantial evidence strong enough to convict. But I guess only intellectuals like you truly know what time it is. Whatever. As the saying goes “A man convinced against his will; is of the same opinion still.”
    Therefore, no need for further banter that will not change Scott’s fate one bit. If this unfolds the way I think it will, no judge or jury will change the outcome of this case despite the sentiments of friends, family memebers, and arm chair crime sleuths.

    • Jim Jones permalink
      March 4, 2012 10:09 pm

      “As I stated before, 30 plus years in law enforcement.”

      And yet you have learned nothing. Not a damn thing. Filling up the gas tanks for the real cops clearly didn’t train you in the difference between real evidence and crap.

      I doubt you can understand this but here’s the difference: If it turned out that the DNA results were screwed up and Laci and Conner were still alive, what would be the same and what could not possibly be the same?

      See? That’s what a functioning brain will do for you.

      Scott Peterson ordering adult channels like millions of other men? Why would that have to change?

      The body found wearing worn out underwear? How can that be explained IF the body was dumped the day it was murdered?

      It is impossible for a body to be in the bay for more than 2 weeks without being reduced to bones. This can happen in as little as 1 day, but NO MORE THAN 16 days. Can’t happen. Never in a million years.

      You will never come up with an explanation which has Scott Peterson dumping his wife’s body AT THE EARLIEST on April 1, plus or minus a couple of days. Never in a million years.

      You will never explain why Conner was a FULL TERM BABY. Never in a million years.

      You will never be able to explain how a body so soft it could not be picked up could wrap itself up in steel-hard plastic tape and tie in in knots without being destroyed. Never in a million years.

      Why don’t you copy this and get the real cops to explain it to you? Maybe they can get you to see some sense, however dimly.

      As for the jury, yeah, right. Playing “jury survivor” – 4 times? Nothing wrong there – NOT. A senile judge, a cop proven to be a perjurer, a prosecutor who lied to the court and a defense that barely tried. That’s “American justice” all right.

      • kingodd permalink
        March 5, 2012 7:22 am

        wait a sec jimmy…let me get this straight. it’s ok for scott to lie about everything (that’s what guys do), but it’s not right when a cop (a known liar), or a prosector (who lied to the court) lies? is there a double standard here? another thing, guys do order porn all the time. they just dont order it when their wife and child are missing you idiot. the autopsy said (months in the water). you are a tool!

        • March 5, 2012 3:43 pm

          kingodd ranted crazily: “wait a sec jimmy…let me get this straight. it’s ok for scott to lie about everything (that’s what guys do), but it’s not right when a cop (a known liar), or a prosector (who lied to the court) lies?”

          Scott Peterson never testified. Further, find me one lie he told except to or about Frey? The true liars were the state, the state witnesses and the jurors who all swore an oath to tell the truth and lied. They are criminals.

          As for the autopsy, it said no such thing. You continue to post crap from the media instead of reading the trial transcript. Not one person offered any proof that Laci could have been in the sea for more than 14 days (science says impossible) or was in the sea for more than one day. Not one.

          Find an eight year old to show you how to use a computer. He can follow the links to a video of an entire African elephant being reduced to bones in 8 days. AN ELEPHANT! Laci weighed just 153 lb.

          You are just another clueless idiot who knows nothing about the law or about evidence. I didn’t think I could have a lower opinion of you.

          You proved me wrong.

        • kingodd permalink
          March 5, 2012 7:00 pm

          “extensive changes of immersion, postmortem animal feeding, tidal effect and decomposition, estimated postmortem interval: MONTHS”
          this is right from the autopsy you idiot! i guess they were in the fix too!

  60. Rob permalink
    March 5, 2012 5:47 pm

    His hair and goatee had been dyed blond, although he claimed the lighter hair color was the result of chlorine from swimming in a friend’s pool. The pool’s owner later testified that, to his knowledge, Peterson had never swum in his pool, or made use of his hot tub.

    Here’s one…but one of many. Whats the point? A page of lies not to include Amber Frey wouldn’t convince folks like you. A mother, father, a friend, or just another nut job wouldn’t be convinced if there were a video tape available. Waste of time.

    Fortunately, these types are few and their opinions don’t make a difference as it shouldn’t. The court’s ruling will stand and thats what matters.

  61. March 5, 2012 7:56 pm

    kingodd ranted: “extensive changes of immersion, postmortem animal feeding, tidal effect and decomposition, estimated postmortem interval: MONTHS”
    this is right from the autopsy you idiot! i guess they were in the fix too!

    It isn’t from the autopsy. It’s crap you made up.

    Brian Peterson: “Yes, your Honor. … Additionally, to my eye there was no evidence of animal feeding.”

    The autopsy quote was: “No evidence of animal feeding”.

  62. March 5, 2012 7:57 pm

    Rob ranted: “His hair and goatee had been dyed blond, although he claimed the lighter hair color was the result of chlorine from swimming in a friend’s pool. The pool’s owner later testified that, to his knowledge, Peterson had never swum in his pool, or made use of his hot tub.”

    So what? It’s well known that hair bleached blond will turn orange from chlorine in a pool.

    However, even if Scott cut his hair into a Mohawk, dyed it blue and went around wearing a G-string, a tutu and army boots and claiming he was a fairy princess it still isn’t evidence of homicide.

    Rob ranted: “Here’s one…but one of many. Whats the point?”

    Indeed. You’ll never get it. You just don’t know how to think. And the only ‘lie’ you could find – wasn’t. “To his knowledge” means he can’t say.

    Rob ranted: “A mother, father, a friend, or just another nut job wouldn’t be convinced if there were a video tape available.”

    Sure.
    A videotape would be great. But we don’t have that.
    An eyewitness would be great. But we don’t have that.
    A confession would be great. But we don’t have that.
    A weapon would be great. But we don’t have that.
    Time of death would be great. But we don’t have that.
    Place of death would be great. But we don’t have that.
    Cause of death would be great. But we don’t have that.
    A crime scene would be great. But we don’t have that.
    Forensic evidence would be great. But we don’t have that.

    All we have is motive.

    On December 14, 2004, a juror, Greg Beratlis, took part in Larry King’s TV show on CNN. During the show, Larry King asked Greg Beratlis the following question.

    “KING: And what do you think his motive was?”

    “BERATLIS: You know, Larry, I think if we all knew the motive, if there was this one thing that stuck out, we’d probably have the answer to the whole thing.”

    So the jury had no motive. NONE. So where is the evidence? ALL of the evidence, ALL of it, goes to his innocence. None goes to guilt.

    Scott Peterson is innocent.

    Rob ranted: “Waste of time.”

    Indeed you are. You simply don’t have the mental acuity to meet any one of my challenges.

    Rob ranted: “Fortunately, these types are few and their opinions don’t make a difference as it shouldn’t.”

    We’ve totally destroyed every piece of evidence that state used and proved beyond any doubt that Scott Peterson is innocent. But you are right about the few. 98% of the public is as dumb as a sack of rocks – as you repeatedly demonstrate.

    Rob ranted: “The court’s ruling will stand and thats what matters.”

    If so, America is doomed. Once the courts are wholly incompetent no nation can stand. However even mad Nancy Grace admits the case will be retried.

    • kingodd permalink
      March 5, 2012 8:32 pm

      just because you rode the “little” yellow bus to school, don’t take it out on me! MONTHS…in the autopsy report. end of story, you lose.

      • March 5, 2012 9:14 pm

        I never lose. I’ve defeated all comers. You’re too easy – your brain doesn’t work and you’ll never have a clue.

        The autopsy report is correct – IF Laci Peterson decomposed in air for a few weeks and was dumped in the sea around April 12th.

        How does that do anything but exonerate Scott Peterson?

        • kingodd permalink
          March 5, 2012 9:22 pm

          now you admit i am right? autopsy report stated months in the bay. very little flesh left.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 11, 2013 4:27 pm

      One of ur best comments but did u have to bring up that nauseating barking mad nancy grace….u ever met such a man hating bull dyke who happens to supposedly be married?

  63. Rob permalink
    March 5, 2012 11:32 pm

    Kingodd, forget it. This guys a nut case who lives in his parent’s garage and monitors this site 24 7.

    • March 6, 2012 1:49 am

      If that were true (it isn’t), how sad a case would that make you since I whip your ass on every point?

      If the two of you added your IQs together you still wouldn’t crack 90.

  64. March 6, 2012 1:52 am

    kingodd ranted: “now you admit i am right? autopsy report stated months in the bay. very little flesh left.”

    That’s not what I said, and not what the autopsy said.

    Pick one:

    1) Decomposed in the bay and therefore died 1 to 14 days before being found or
    2) Decomposed in air and dumped in the bay 1 to 14 days before being found.

    There are only these two choices.

    BTW, look up Dunning Kruger effect and try to understand it. It’s better than demonstrating it repeatedly.

    • kingodd permalink
      March 6, 2012 7:14 am

      do you pleasure yourself to SP photos?

      • March 6, 2012 1:55 pm

        That’s where your ‘mind’ goes? So telling — like your inability to answer even one question or come up with just one original thought.

        • kingodd permalink
          March 6, 2012 7:02 pm

          there are people on this web page who have taken the time to research the case, and instead of you coversing with them in a kindly manner, you simply dismiss their opinions (or facts) as bein wrong if they don’t agree with yours. it did say “months” in the autopsy report, and that is a fact, i read it. but instead of having a healthy debate over the issue, you taunt people, and call them things like “un-american” i don’t think you realize just how crazy you really sound. everyone here makes fun of you because that is what you deserve sir.

        • March 6, 2012 9:24 pm

          kingodd: there are people on this web page who have taken the time to research the case

          There are. Every one of them says the same thing – Scott Peterson was an innocent man wrongly convicted in a witch hunt atmosphere. You are not one of these people.

          kingodd: and instead of you coversing with them in a kindly manner, you simply dismiss their opinions (or facts) as bein wrong if they don’t agree with yours.

          Because the one sure thing I can tell you about “these people” is that they cannot answer a single objection that has been raised – and I have raised dozens.

          kingodd: it did say “months” in the autopsy report, and that is a fact, i read it.

          And yet you can’t quote it – even though it is online. (PWC-SII)

          Quote: Conclusion

          “These studies show the very rapid changes a stillborn fetus undergoes in the womb of a living woman. Conner’s macerated condition is not consistent with a 3.5 month intrauterine retention period. He did not have severe desquamation and he was not compressed or mummified.

          Furthermore, retention in the womb of a dead mother, who is undergoing her own decomposition, would most certainly accelerate the rate of change.

          Experts in the field of stillborn fetal maceration should have been consulted to determine the maximum time Conner could have been retained in Laci’s womb after he died. Such experts still can provide valuable information, as the autopsy pictures are preserved.”

          kingodd: but instead of having a healthy debate over the issue, you taunt people, and call them things like “un-american” i don’t think you realize just how crazy you really sound. everyone here makes fun of you because that is what you deserve sir.

          You hate Americans.
          America IS Americans.
          And yet you can’t make the logical deduction.

          And people TRY to “make fun of me”. They fail since they are ignorant of the facts.

        • kingodd permalink
          March 12, 2012 5:55 pm

          if the underwear is the best thing you can come up with, you should stop watching crap like C.S.I. also, your opinion on the matter holds zero facts. underwear? c’mon, really? who knows what happens to clothing after MONTHS in the bay. i don’t know what kind of underwear your wife wears (most likely something flannel, with buttons in the front) but most women wear underwear that is very shear, and lightweight. which means that it will break down much easier than say, jeans. try to explain how mark geragos (one of the best trial lawyers in the country) failed to see all of this so called evidence for the defense.

        • March 12, 2012 9:53 pm

          Are you some sort of backwoods moron? Or just brain damaged?

          The real autopsy report: “The front of the panties was also intact. As I said, the rear portion was missing. The front was still intact, along with the bands around the legs.”

          So how is the seat worn away totally while the front is in perfect condition? This can only be caused by wear which proves she lived for weeks after she was abducted — which proves Scott is innocent!

          Bwahaha. Watching your tiny mind try to explain anything is like watching a 4 year old try to explain nuclear fusion. Come to think of it, a 4 year old would do better than you.

        • kingodd permalink
          March 12, 2012 10:07 pm

          worn out by wear? you sure? is that the best you have? so its not possible the rear of the underwear wore in the bay, while the front stayed intact? who are you? dr baden? it tells me no more than the rear of the underwear was worn. are you really using that as evidence? are you scott? three months in the bay, and anything can happen. things can wear on one side due to body positioning you idiot. the detective kit you bought was right out of a dime store magazine. underwear worn on one side = not guilty? you act as if what you say is fact (it is not) you only consider your theories (reaches at best) and you are an idiot (fact)

        • kingodd permalink
          March 12, 2012 6:05 pm

          um…people don’t try and make fun of you….they do make fun of you. can’t you read? un-american? let me guess….you watch a lot of the fox news network don’t ya? i bet bill oreilly, and sean hannity. aren’t you being unamerican by not siding with your fellow countrymen (the jurors). our system of justice is unique to our country but you just turn your nose up to it? shame on you for spitting on our glorious flag, and all that it stands for.

  65. flishface permalink
    March 12, 2012 3:03 am

    voicesanity,what a name for an idiot. There’s nothing sane about you. You must live with our head in the sand. scott peterson is a sociopath, clear and simple. He murdered his wife and unborn son because they were soon to be a burden. He had already planned his life after the murders. I just wish they would get the needle out and put it to use.

    • kingodd permalink
      March 12, 2012 6:20 am

      dont start with sanity, he won’t listen. i quoted statements taken directly from the autopsy report, and sanity said they did not exist. he is a nut job.

  66. March 12, 2012 1:10 pm

    Has the lunatic asylum left a keyboard unlocked again? I must speak to the director. And clearly they have both of you on way too high a dose of stupid pills.

    BTW, still no explanation for Laci’s underwear I see, so I’m right as always.

  67. flishface permalink
    March 12, 2012 3:01 pm

    Voiceinsanity
    You should be a writer, you come up with some funny shit. Are you going to the dirtbag’s execution? If so’ I’ll see you there, I’ll be one of the thousands cheering.

    • March 12, 2012 3:25 pm

      No, I’ll cheer when he sues the city, county and state for wrongful conviction. I hope he gets millions from the bastard scum.

      And still no explanation for Laci’s underwear I see, so I’m right as always.

  68. flishface permalink
    March 12, 2012 4:06 pm

    VoiceInsanity
    Don’t hold your breathe, he’ll get the needle before that happens. Look at the bright side, maybe the dirtbag’s family will be well off by then from all the begging from weirdos like you. I’ll be there showing support for Laci and Conner’s family. You’ll be there wailing about poor scott finally going to hell where he belongs.

  69. March 12, 2012 9:56 pm

    kingodd ranted like a lunatic: “um…people don’t try and make fun of you….they do make fun of you. can’t you read? shame on you for spitting on our glorious flag, and all that it stands for.”

    You are the one spitting on the flag. Your hatred of America is poisonous. Too bad your IQ is lower than zero.

    • kingodd permalink
      March 12, 2012 10:14 pm

      i am sitting here with some friends and we are all laughing at you. this is a riot!!!! unamerican because i don’t agree with you…you’re a peach. you must move out of your mom’s basement, it’s making you cranky.

  70. flishface permalink
    March 13, 2012 12:08 am

    VoiceInsanity a nut job? Maybe most of it’s screws are a little loose, but I don’t know if it qualifies as a 100% nut job yet. I think VioceInsanity is still in denial and thinks if it keeps it’s head in the sand long enough, things will be OK when removed. The dirtbag killer might have to face a bad ass in prison that has kids at home and then all will be over and done with. A person that kills his wife and unborn son is worse than a child molester in their eyes.

  71. March 13, 2012 12:59 am

    kingodd ranted: “i am sitting here with some friends”

    You? Friends? That’s hysterically funny! Those are your fellow inmates in the asylum – or the guards to stop you nut jobs getting loose.

  72. March 13, 2012 1:06 am

    crapface ranted: “[Scott Peterson] might have to face a bad ass in prison that has kids at home and then all will be over and done with. A person that kills his wife and unborn son ”

    You really are sick. The other people on death row say the same thing when they see him – they tell him he got screwed by the 12 dumbest hillbillies in Redwood City. They don’t say that about Charles Ng, or Gerald Parker, or Richard Ramirez or several other actual killers and truly evil people there. He’s well liked by everyone. It’s only truly sick people like you who have your twisted little sadistic fantasies about him. That’s because you are too stupid to ever have a real thought or any understanding of reality.

    Why did the prosecutor admit he had no evidence against Scott Peterson in his closing?

    • kingodd permalink
      March 13, 2012 6:33 am

      oh….now the jury was rigged

  73. flishface permalink
    March 13, 2012 3:15 am

    I take back what I said about VoiceInsanity, it really is off it’s rocker. Now it must have ESPN or something. How does it know what the other people on death row are telling the dirtbag? Oh, now I get it, the dirtbag tells you, like he tells you, I’M INNOCENT. Another thing, there’s probably not 12 real hillbillies in all of Redwood City. The prosecutor said they had no evidence against the dirtbag in closing statements? I must have missed that. I’ll have to dig the transcript out and look that up. You talk about evil, the dirtbag is pure evil and I hope he sees his dead wife and unborn son every time he closes his eyes, every time he blinks until they strap him to the table.

  74. March 13, 2012 3:40 am

    Slimebucket ranted crazily: “How does [an actual intelligent human] know what the other people on death row are telling [Mr Peterson]?”

    Simple. I got a message from someone who visits another prisoner on a regular basis. The same information has been reported by prison officials.

    Slimebucket ranted crazily: “The prosecutor said they had no evidence against the dirtbag in closing statements? I must have missed that.”

    You miss everything. That’s why little children point at you and laugh. They think a village has lost its idiot.

    Distaso: “I can’t tell you when he did it. I can’t tell you if he did it at night. I can’t tell you if he did it in the morning. I’m not going to try to convince you of something that I can’t prove. I don’t have to prove that to you. I only have to prove that he did it.”

    He also couldn’t tell the jury where Laci died. He couldn’t tell then what the cause of death was. He couldn’t tell them when she died. He couldn’t offer a motive. So he couldn’t tell anyone: what, why, when, where or how. And from this ignorance of every fact and detail he claimed they could tell who. He invited the jury to guess everything and when they couldn’t the judge substituted jury members until he got 12 dummies who WOULD guess.

    I hope they all burn in hell along with all of the moronic haters like you.

  75. Maci permalink
    April 2, 2012 5:29 pm

    The only thing that matters has nothing to do with the “wear” of Laci’s underpants…the ONLY thing that matters is that a “jury of his peers”, which I guess makes him a dumb hillbilly in Redwood, convicted Scott Peterson and he was sentenced to death for the crime. I don’t think it matters what “Voice Sanity” regurgitates repeatedly.

  76. cricket ca permalink
    April 9, 2012 3:48 am

    Why has no one investigated Amber Frey ?
    Is she a girl who became obsessed with Scott , quickly ?
    Did she check around thru people or internet and discovered he was married
    being it was christmas and he was not seeing her ?
    Did she go to his house to find out ?
    Scott had unportected sex with this girl and told her he highly regretted it.
    Did she find out not only was this guy married but his wife was pregnant?
    Did she confront Laci walking the dog or at the home?
    Did Laci tell her Scott was gone fishing, which is why this place
    was choosen to leave laci ?
    Ambers calls seem to increase on the 25th, one after the other .
    I guess what I am asking is Was Scott Framed From A Fatal Attraction
    I know this sounds bazarr but it really looks like it?

    Where was this Amber at this time?
    And Lacis watch missing – that is also a girls watch ..

    I dont know anyone involved in this, it is just what is see on the outside..
    Looks like a fatal attraction.

    • April 9, 2012 12:32 pm

      Many of us looked at Frey. She had a strong motive and no alibi. Even the police considered her but only as an accomplice of Scott’s (despite their claims they never considered that he might NOT be guilty). For similar cases, see Michelle Gaiser, Stephanie Lazarus and Shawna Nelson.

      However no one can point to any actual evidence against Frey. It doesn’t seem likely. For what really happened, Google (another9912 scott peterson) and read the first two pages there.

  77. cricket ca permalink
    April 9, 2012 3:50 am

    i honestly think they have the wrong person …

  78. taylor permalink
    May 3, 2012 12:58 am

    Listen, I don’t know enough about this case to say whether he is innocent or not. But what i do know is SP admitted he cheated on his pregnant wife in the past. Just for that Scott peterson should be ashamed of himself. Maybe if he would have stayed home and protected Laci instead of going fishing on Christmas Eve, Laci would still be alive. Voice of Sanity you must seriously be either a very disturbed unbalanced person or maybe a bad person with no moral fiber for even trying to take up for this person. He made his bed and now he has to lie in it,(and eventually die in it). All evidence from the body aside, all his actions beginning the day of the disappearance points to his guilt. People that really love their spouse wouldn’t act like that. He should have done whatever he possibly could to find her. Not just give up looking and even continue his affair. Voise of Sanity- sometimes there isnt a body at all in a crime and so we must also look at the actions of the suspected individual. Even if some of what you say about the body and fetus is true it doesnt matter. Some people are very clever and commit the perfect crime. That is why we must also use our common sense to evaluate and reach the truth. His own actions did him in. Even if he didn’t do it he just made himself look so darn guilty. In the end SCOTT PETERSON will always be a Cheater and horrible husband and father. He should of been there to protect them. I dont care how much a person can put on the charm and pretend to be a good person to the outside world, it will always be their actions that speak the loudest. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. Voise of Sanity go find an inmate who’s a good person and actually deserves an appeal and your time and effort. Scott peterson does nt deserve mercy. Let GOD sort it out

  79. Serenesusan permalink
    May 26, 2012 11:51 pm

    Sadly it seems that SP was Fried in the court of Media sensationalism. I thought I read somewhere that the Dogs took the investigators to Gallo in searching for Laci. I also thought that the burglary of the neighbors home was under reported and not fully investigated. And wasn’t there something about Laci’s watch turning up. To me there is more evidence that at least some other people were involved. I don’t care how good of a cleaner SP could be I don’t think it is at all possible he could have removed all the evidence. I have no idea if he is innocent or guilty. What I do know was that he was not provided a fair trial. Changing the Judge, dismissing jurors. Especially the only juror qualified to review the evidence was the Doc. This was totally a kangaroo court. He was tried and convicted by the media before he was ever arrested. I don’t believe any case that gets the overwhelming media attention like this case can ever have fair trial. No one can honestly say they were not influenced by the media. I happened to watch the SP movie last night an started googling it. I think there is a load of questionable facts for his conviction and too much evidence that was not heard. I am in no way saying he is a nice guy, I happen to think cheaters are selfish to say the least, but if men where convicted for cheating there would not be many men left. I am overwhelmingly convinced that opposition to SP are really emotionally tanked and like the prosecutors put out more emotional jargon than fact. There was no convincing evidence against him just speculation and for that the Country should be sorry. There is absolutely no evidence that can say how she died, where she died, or who did it. They can not even agree on how long she was in the water or weather the baby was full term or not. I see 2 specialists agree the baby was full term. I find the fact that the baby was not more decomposed the strongest evidence that perhaps she died someplace else. There is no glove to fit. There is no evidence other than that Laci and Conner are deceased. I don’t think that an appeal should take this long. There is sufficient reason to retry this case just based on the the jury issues. This is an man’s life. Is it not enough that a mother and child were murdered. How do we take someone’s life without an adequate trial.

  80. alwaysgraceful permalink
    May 28, 2012 3:47 pm

    @sanity

    I don’t know who killed Laci and Connor Peterson. I didn’t read the court documents, I didn’t follow the trial too closely, I didn’t read any of the books published afterwards, I’m not an expert in any way. But when I did hear news from the trial it always bothered me.The press was vicious, the public outcry so violent, it didn’t feel right. It was a public lynching before there was a trial, verdict or evidence was revealed in court. There was a unified energy focused on taking him down versus finding the truth. So I don’t know. But sanity, let me ask you a question. I’ve been reading some of this thread and you are so convinced he didn’t do it. I don’t know who you are, male or female and I guess it doesn’t matter but sanity, did you kill her?

  81. DEANA permalink
    June 2, 2012 8:15 pm

    What if ??.. Laci killing was a cover up of another crime , namely (Evelyn Hernandez.) both have similarity sharing the same near location of place of water of discovery and missing body parts.

    share the same look short length hair color dark. small frame,olive skin tone. clothing from motherhood on body. same type of panties sports – boxer. very pregnant and very cute.

    killed months apart – yet no one seemed to make a connection with theses two victims.

    If their is a connection to any-one associate with the burglar’s of the Medina home they may have a start as to whom may be behind the death of these two beautiful women .

  82. June 29, 2012 12:59 am

    After carefully reading all these blogs,, I’m not siding with anyone,but I do understand both sides. People are sooo wrongfully accussed it seems all the time. People that are guilty are not accussed so they walk free.. This is the world weve built. If an outsider reads these blogs,,they would see republicans and democrats at a boxing match. This is what America has came too. What ever happen too,,,If a person makes one mistake,,they will soon make another one,,etc..eventually they will make that mistake to hang themselves!!! If scott peterson did the crime,,he will never tell..He will take that to his grave. and thats just my own personal view. Every human being is entitled to their own opinion and should not be attacked in doin so. I would hate to be accused of any thing and im innocent,, but if their is any association with that crime,, then im just as guilty as the person whom committed the crime. It’s really sad and disturbing to read these blogs of adults whom cannot conversate withoug name calling and or getting soo upset at someone’s opinion?? I respect everyone’s views on the Sp trials..it is a very interesting case. Everyone have a good day.

  83. flishface permalink
    July 17, 2012 12:49 am

    I’ve been “assussed” of a few things over the years, but I always come out on top. The difference is, evidence of my innocence. Now take peterson on the other hand, they proved beyond a doubt that he is a killer. He killed his wife and his own flesh and blood. And all because he wanted to be a playboy. Why didn’t he just divorce his beautiful wife and let her get on with her life? Because he’s a sociopath, thats why. I hope when they give him the injection his whole life flashes before his eyes, especially the killing part. Actually injection is too good for scum like him. Are his parents still begging from the bleeding hearts out there?

  84. chrissy permalink
    July 20, 2012 12:22 pm

    flishface.. yep they are!!! didnt ANYONE listen to his recorded cell phone records? they even recorded him listening to his voice mails. and how they pinged him at the marina while they searched for her .. when he told them he was in Bakersfield.. i followed EVERY second of this case. .. he clearly did it.. i hope he gets his sentence that was given to him. i see he filed for his appeal … based on court mess ups.. .. i hope to god they throw it out.. u never know these days if he will be convicted again look at the casey bi@tch! who would have thought she would get off for killing her baby girl…

  85. Corey permalink
    August 20, 2012 8:06 am

    People, arguing with “The Voice of Sanity” is like trying to argue with a child who desparately needs a nap. It is of no use. You are arguing with someone of limited intelligence. Someone who has already decided in his/her own brain that Peterson is innocent and NOTHING is going to change their mind. Why? Because this person only wants to see what they want to see. – They are going to see what facts suit their insane ideas, and ignore the truth.
    BTW, I live in Modesto, about 5 blocks from the former Peterson house. I helped search along HWY 132 on my horse for three days. So, yes, I was invested in this whole incident. And us involved with this case, who know certain people in the Modesto Police Department, knew what was going on fairly shortly. Scott Peterson, who may be a “handsome” guy (I personally see him as the devil now) and who was a social guy, good golfer, etc, etc, was, acting like an alien after Lacy was gone.
    While I was putting up fliers in downtown Modesto (between I and 10th street) he was talking to Amber Frey and figuring out a way to cover up the murder and be with her. “Yes Amber. I can barelky hear you. I’m at the Eiffel Tower right now. There’s a huge crowd and the fireworks are amazing!” While he was saying this, I was watching a candle light vigile at Graceda Park, which was the saddest thing ever. It was so real and made you care for the Rocha family so much, because every one of us there was saying to ourselves, ”
    what if it was one of our family?”

    You know, most married men, who’s wives have just been murdered, do not concern themselves with keeping a relationship with “the other woman.” They do not talk on the phone with her, apparently not caring for one second unless he knows that she’s never coming back.
    He does not lie to the police over and over and over and over.
    He does not lie to their girlfriend in hopes that once thier “dead, missing wife” situation “blows over” he can get back together with her.
    He does not start lying to her all over again on the phone once he’s figured out that the police are “onto him.”
    He doesn’t get caught 20 miles from the border of Mexico, (which was 90 miles away from his parents house in San Diego) with a new haircut. Changed hair and beard color. $15,000 and camping gear in the trunk of his rented car.
    (BTW, there was NO reason for him to rent a car at that time. His parent had 4 cars of their own and he had one of his own…….but for some reason, he rented one? Why?)

    “Sanity” Shut up. Stop with your unfound “facts” and rediculous theories.
    Scott Peterson killed his wife Lacy. There are more facts to support it “BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.” Let me repeat that: “BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.”

    And now, all the screwy arguments that you’ve come up with are not going to change the fact that he is guilty and you are wrong. Let me repeat that, and maybe it will sink in: YOU ARE WRONG.

    Scott Peterson does not deserve your thoughts and screwy arguments. He is a murderer. Sharon Rocha and Lacys family deserve your thoughts. And not just your, “I feel sorry for you but Scott didn’t do it thoughts.”

    Do everyone a favor……………………………………………………..and shut the HELL up.

  86. Sheila permalink
    August 20, 2012 8:22 am

    Omg Corey – you are right on point. I used to get caught up arguing with insanity but finally realized there was no reasoning with him/her. I suspect there is a family connection there but who knows. Bottom line is for those of us with our minds intact who can see the forest thru the trees, we know that SP is guilty as sin and is where he belongs. So why bother beating our heads against the wall. The Rochas have to continue their lives without Laci and Conner and that is where my sympathies lie. You put it so well though, thank you!

  87. Corey permalink
    August 21, 2012 2:53 am

    Read some of the comments today. Yikes! Some of you (Sanity) are scary people.

    And I found it interesting that there is a correlation between the people who think Scott is innocent and the people who cannot spell or write. It seems very interesting that posters here who barely have the writing skills of a child, all doubt Scott Peterson’s guilt.
    (BTW, I’m not talking about a misspelled word here or there. I’m talking about the posters who have no grammar skills what so ever, and the inability to write a readable sentence. – One more thing junior G-men…… “Alot” is TWO WORDS! ;)

  88. Corey permalink
    August 21, 2012 6:21 am

    Part of a taped conversation between Amber Frey (F), and Scott Peterson (P) once Scott figured out that Amber knew all about Laci missing. And yet, he still tries to lie to her and convince her that he had nothing to do with her “disappearance.”

    Notice that when Amber asks him the hard questions, he stutters and shuts up to “protect her from the media.” My own comments are in [.................] quotes.

    PETERSON: Uh … you haven’t been watching the news, obviously?

    [Actually, he knows damn well that Amber knows all about it, and he's trying to find out what she knows.]

    FREY: No.

    P: Um … I have not been, traveling during the last couple of weeks. I have … I have lied to you … that I’ve been traveling.

    [He's confessing to her because he knows there's a strong chance that she knows everything he's been doing, and this call is to make himself look good to her and the Modesto Police Department. He still thinks he can get away with it.]

    F: Okay.

    P: The girl I’m married to … her name is Laci. [She's not "a girl" Scott. She your WIFE]

    F: Uh-hum.

    P: She disappeared, just before Christmas. [LIE]

    F: Uh-hum.

    P: For the past two weeks, I’ve been in Modesto, with her family and mine … searching for her.

    [LIE]

    F: Okay.

    P: She just disappeared, and no one knows …

    [Where? Of course you do. LIAR]

    F: Okay, now …

    P: … where she’s been.

    F: Scott?

    P: And I … I can’t tell you more, because I … I need, you too be protected from the media … and Ayiana.

    [Notice how he says, "I need" before he says, "you too." That's what this whole conversation is for Scott: Damage Control.]

    F: Okay.

    P: Okay, they are amazing.

    F: Scott …

    P: Yeah.

    F: … are you listening?

    P: I am.

    F: You came to me earlier in December and told me that you had lost your wife. What was that about?

    [Well Amber, he had already planned on killing her at that point. His plan was:
    1. Kill pregnant wife.
    2. Act like a sad widower for a while after the empty casket funeral because no one was going to find her dead body.
    3. Secretly see you for a while, and then after enough "grieving time" had gone by and everyone felt sorry for me, I'll go back to my life as a care free bachelor! And, if you Amber, get in the way, I'll just toss you into a dumpster!]

    P: She’s (unintelligible) … she’s alive.

    F: What?

    P: She’s alive.

    [LIE]

    F: Where? She’s alive? Where?

    P: In Modesto. Now, I know I … I’ve … this is the hardest … I … I wanted to tell you in person. I … here … you need to protect yourself from the media.

    F: OK.

    P: OK. If you even watch the news at all … well, you haven’t. Um … the media … has been telling everyone that I had something to do with her disappearance. So the past two weeks I’ve been, hunted by the media. And I just … I don’t want you to be involved … in this, to protect yourself. I know that I’ve, ya know, I’ve destroyed. And I, God, I hope … I hope so much that … this doesn’t hurt you.

    [LIE. Actually, he's lying to her to gain sympathy and convince her that what she has seen on the news is false. Because the media "hunted him" - He knows that if he can convince her and make her feel sorry for him, she might not let the whole world know he's a lying, cheating, scumbag while his pregnant wife was still alive.]

    F: How could it not affect me?

    P: It does. And I just …

    F: How … how … could u possibly think this would not affect me?

    [Because I'm arrogant and think I'm smarter than you and convince you of anything. I'm also smarter than the Modesto Police Department and everyone else. Because I've always been a spoiled ass growing up in San Diego and think that Modesto is full of a bunch of dumb hicks.]

    P: Amber, I know it does.

    F: (sigh)

    P: But I … I … I know I had … I … I have just been torn up the last two weeks wanting to, tell you and I’m so weak that I haven’t. And I just … I just hope that … uh … I had … to call you and tell you that.

    [I'll bet that people being shocked by a bolt of lightening stutter less than this guy...]

    F: You never … you never answered my question, Scott?

    P: Sweetie, you don’t … you don’t … I can’t … I can’t say anymore …

    [Sweetie, I have been lying to the police, media and Rocha family so much that I can't keep my head straight, so I'm going to stutter and bumble my way through this phonecall without answering your legitimate questions and hope you buy my "poor me" act.]

    F: I think I deserve …

    P: You deserve so much better. There’s no question you deserve so much better.

    F: Yeah, and I deserve to understand an explanation of why you told me you lost your wife and this was the first holidays you’d spend without her? That was Dec. 9th … you told me this and how all of a sudden your wife’s missing? … are you kidding me?

    P: Yeah she …

    F: … Did you hear me?

    P: I did … I … I … I … I don’t know what to say … I …

    [Again, I... I.... I... I've been lying so much to everyone that I just want to get off the phone because I know the police are listening to me. And, my palms are sweating so much I can barely hold my cell phone.]

    F: I think an explanation would uh … be a start.

    P: I know absolutely deserve an explanation, sweetie …

    F: Yes, I do. I do.

    P: And I want to give you one.

    F: I’m listening.

    P: I … I can’t now … I mean you don’t understand.

    [I can't now.....or ever....because I don't have another lie for you. And if I told you the truth I would go to jail for strangling my pregnant wife in our home and then dumping her body in the bay on Christmas Eve, as I have a strong suspicion the police have gotten to you]

    F: … But I … I … I don’t understand why …

    P: … You don’t understand the situation … and …

    F: Then why don’t you fill me in on the situation and … and make me understand?

    P: I can’t now. I’m so sorry for that.

    [See above explanation]

    F: Why can’t you? Why?

    P: It’s … it’s to protect all of us.

    F: To protect all of who?

    P: Everyone involved.

    F: So, where is she?

    P: That’s what, we are trying to find out. We have … it’s a nationwide search. We have … I mean it’s a half a million dollar reward for information leading to her safe return.

    [A "nationwide" search? Really Scott? Didn't you even know the parameters of the search? I did, because I was helping. It went as far east as Tulloch Lake. As far north as Stockton. As far south as North Turlock. And as far west (actually, north west) as where the they actually found her in the Bay. But, a "nationwide search?" Apparently Scott was under the impression that the MPD looking in dowtown St. Louis, the Florida Everglades and Nebraska..????]

    F: Okay. So, again, you never answer my question. Why did you tell me it would be the first holidays without her?

    P: I can’t. Sweetie, I can’t explain anymore now.

    – This is just a small exerpt of the conversations Scott had with Amber. He also spoke this way to his parents, the Modesto Police dept. and the national media. Remember him on the national media? With that soft, poor me voice, and even though he was wiping his eyes, though throughout the interview, he did not cry ONE TEAR…..

    – By the way, ” Scott believers.” I have read more about this case that you’ll ever know. (And two of my relatives worked the case) So if you have any questions, I’ll answer them if I ever come back onto this site. But one thing I will NOT do, is argue with people like:

    “Voice of Sanity” – most of your facts are dead wrong. You either make them up to suit your psychotic visions, or have an 85 IQ. Either way, I’m not going to take the time to dispute BS.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 11, 2013 5:11 pm

      Oh cool 2 of ur relatives sat around eating doughnuts while the real killers got away….by any chance were either of ur relatives the brain surgeons who told the media scotts alibi so that the kidnappers would know where to dump the body to make it look like scott did it?
      Or did ur relatives hire the hydrologist for the prosecution who said there was no way that the bodies came from where scott was in the bay? (Yet unbelievably the jury convicts)
      So thanks for letting us know ur relatives are lazy incompetent and are so uncaring about a pregnant woman being murdered they let the murderers go

  89. Angie permalink
    September 6, 2012 3:33 pm

    WOW! douchebag you are Voice of Sanity! SCOTT never loved Laci- So do yourself a favor and out of respect to the late Laci and her son: Don’t even say it! Your facts are so wrong that it is a shame someone like you has access to the internet and to blogging- I believe in freedom of speech- but you sir, do not deserve it. I hope and pray that youwere able to make something out of your sorry, pathetic life.
    Have a nice day!

  90. Angel permalink
    September 7, 2012 2:04 am

    From the moment i heard about this murder back in 2002-2003 I thought Mr.Peterson was guilty…but yesterday I obtained and read Matt Dalton’s book “Presumed Guilty” and what time I’m not saying he didn’t do it…I am saying there is so many things in this book tha
    t gives cause for reasonable doubt. I am just saying maybe give him a new trial,a chance to have all the evidence and witnesses presented…We should just be sure because Laci and Connor deserve true justice

  91. September 7, 2012 4:34 pm

    Hello, i think that i noticed you visited my web site thus i came to go back the prefer?.I am attempting to in finding issues to improve my web site!I guess its adequate to make use of some of your ideas!!

  92. Margie Ann permalink
    November 11, 2012 1:37 am

    Voted against repealing the death penalty the other day… was thinkn about Scott Peterson!

    • November 11, 2012 2:08 am

      Thank you for that. Thanks to people like you, Scott is guaranteed all the funds needed for a new trial and his eventual release from prison. Without you he might have died in there.

      Well done!

      • kingodd permalink
        November 11, 2012 10:01 am

        hey sanity, how’s that re-trial coming? hahahahahaha

    • Sheila permalink
      November 11, 2012 7:48 am

      Good for you Margie Ann. Over here on the east coast my family was just discussing the death penalty and how that bastard deserves it. And now you can join the rest of the people on here and ignore Voice of Insanity.

  93. Sheila permalink
    November 11, 2012 3:12 pm

    I don’t think innocent people should be executed, but we are not talking about innocent people we are talking about Scott Peterson. I have been thru this before with you and I refuse to stoop down to your name calling level. Bye

  94. Rayca permalink
    November 14, 2012 4:03 pm

    Hey (In) “Sanity” –Like minds think alike. Psychopaths clearly are attracted to each other. Who knows? You probably ARE Scott Peterson, for all we know.

  95. Lisa permalink
    November 18, 2012 5:07 am

    Scott, You are guilty as guilty comes ! Hopeyou rot in jail and have time to go deeper insane!

  96. lee elliott permalink
    December 28, 2012 5:13 pm

    Sanity, I feel very sorry for you. I think you are a very lonely individual who has developed a very unhealthy obsession for whatever reason and have deluded yourself into believing Scott is innocent regardless of the facts. In an earlier post you stated you do not watch television and I firmly believe you are probably convinced Martians are trying to contact you . Stop posting, place a piepan on yopur head and get some help. We will all better for it.

  97. January 2, 2013 11:43 am

    i think with all this asumption of scott committing this crime i think the courts should look into a medium to help solve this.there are so many pyshics that are good and could solve this.the long island medium for example.lacie could tell her who did it

  98. John D. Carter permalink
    January 16, 2013 7:34 pm

    To “A Voice of Sanity”
    I do not have a clue as to who you are, but I want to thank you for taking such a strong stand, as to regarding the facts of this case. Scott was convicted on emotion and not facts. It is a travesty to our justice system to see how someone can be convicted of a heinous crime, base solely on emotion without any proof whatsoever. Unfortunately, Scott was not well represented in my opinion. He should have testified in my opinion and not dodged any of the facts related to his infidelity which of course he was guilty of. Many of those who adamantly attest to Scott’s guilt, simply do not understand dominant male psychology. He simply enjoyed the sex and that ultimately put the nail in his coffin. An intelligent person, who looks at all the fact objectively, should be able to understand that Scott was wrongly convicted.

    • jane woodcock permalink
      January 17, 2013 11:07 am

      i dont know who you are but wheather or not scott liked sex he should have divorced his wife if he wanted sex from someone else.if a person is not happy at home then leave. killing should not be a way out of things.they were both so young with many years ahead of them.if scott did not want her or his baby then just leave.his brain is retarded to think of murder.a medium should be brought in and find out who really did it.then if he did do it i think he should die the same way his family did

      • chris ferguson permalink
        March 11, 2013 4:36 pm

        For all we know laci gave Scott permission to have sex elsewhere….especially if she wasn’t wanting sex being so pregnant…. or even an open marriage

        • carebear permalink
          May 24, 2013 2:06 am

          very possible

      • chris ferguson permalink
        March 11, 2013 4:42 pm

        Omg…hahahaha….a medium???? I didnt read the whole message at 1st….now we have PROOF of what kind of genius we’re dealing with here….oh my…haha…bring in the medium, lets see what laci has to say
        …oh forget it…what a tard

  99. John D. Carter permalink
    January 17, 2013 4:50 pm

    A medium? Are you out of your mind? That is sick!!

    • jane woodcock permalink
      January 17, 2013 5:14 pm

      anyone that would say that no one understands the dominant male psychology and simply enjoyed the sex.well you are sick to think that way.it sounds like you could murder too for sex.at least i am thinking of ways to find out if he really did do it rather than looking into the mind of a male

  100. flishface permalink
    January 18, 2013 1:57 pm

    When is the batshit crazy killer going to get the needle? Soon I hope, he’s sucking up air that his murdered wife and son should be breathing. To “voice of INSANITY”, I’m glad you’re still supporting the killer’s family financially. They are leeches and need people like you to keep them in the life style they are accustomed to. I mean they have to buy a lot of Kleenex and hand lotion, due to all the weeping and hand wringing they do to whoever will listen while begging. Yea, bring in a medium, get out the Weegie Board, I’m sure you won’t like what they find out. Before the sociopath’s heart takes it’s last beat, my only hope is that he finally confesses. His dead wife & son’s family might be able to find some closure.

    • jane woodcock permalink
      January 18, 2013 3:09 pm

      i never said i believed he was guilty or innocent you idiot.if you were in prison and said you did not do it would you not want people to find the truth or would you like to be put to death for not doing the crime.why don;t you open your mind up and be realistic instead of acting like a crazy killer or maybe you are not acting..if you don;t believe in mediums thats up to you so i will put a spell on you .you are going to have alot of bad luck in the year 2013.

    • chris ferguson permalink
      March 11, 2013 4:10 pm

      I hope u get railroaded by a biased jury some day and when ur sitting next to ur “new friend, BUBBA” and screaming “but im innocent ” just think about this…..haha

  101. flishface permalink
    January 18, 2013 4:08 pm

    Mr. Woodcock, PLEASE don’t put a spell on me, I promise to believe any and all of your bullshit theories from here on out. I’ve never killed a living thing in my life, unlike the sociopath peterson. As far as being realistic, tell me again how that convicted killer is not responsible for his actions. Now lets get to the idiot part, reread both of our posts. It’s obvious by your lack of capitals, spaces and spelling that you are on drugs of some sort or are a true idiot. I rest my case, your honor. Don’t forget about the spell thing, I’m shaking in my boots and don’t think I’ll be able to sleep tonight. You should be ashamed of yourself, making threats like that. People might start thinking you’re a little batshit crazy yourself.

  102. flishface permalink
    January 18, 2013 4:11 pm

    Mr. Woodycock, If you do put a spell on me, when will it expire? Maybe 1/18/2014, or just to the end of 2013? Just wondering how long I have to hide under the bed.

  103. flishface permalink
    January 18, 2013 9:09 pm

    Wheres Mr. Woodcock at? The spell seems to be working, I just bought a CA scratcher lottery ticket and won $200.00, Keep the mojo coming at me. Can you check with one of your medium friends and get the numbers for the big draw tomorrow night? I’ll split with you 80 for me 20 for you.

  104. cricket,ca permalink
    March 15, 2013 10:51 pm

    I honestly believe Scott is innocent …
    This totally sounds like a fatal attraction with this wack nut Amber Frey…
    Was she ever given a lie detector test, being she couldnt prove her
    where abouts at the time ..
    Was the trunk of her car ever checked for hair fibers or blood,
    if not can the car she had be traced to see if it still exists
    and someone examine the trunk of the car ..
    She knew where Scott went fishing …
    I dont believe Scott put Laci there , I believe Laci was put there
    for Scott to find ..
    I dont believe Scott would ever do harm to a unborn baby but some wack
    nut who was totally out of her mind finding out Cott not only had a wife but had a pregnant wife after laying into to her about using birthcontrol – could of caused her to loose it especially if she was totally inlove with this guy.
    Then low and behold look who shows up to the police as the poor
    inncocent girl and single handed solves the whole case – huhh
    Did anyone check Amber Freys credit cards to see if she was near Scotts or near the fishing place ??
    There is noway Scott would of told people he was going fishing and then leave Laci and the baby there .. Scott was set up !!
    Someone really needs to investigate Amber Frey the answer is there ..

  105. George Eynon permalink
    March 16, 2013 11:36 pm

    Man oh Man…there are some flaky donuts in this box ! First of all, I would like to respond to Cricket. Go get your G.E.D. It really will help you later in life. Now for those who believe that Scott peterson is innocent. Who do you think killed Lacy & Conner? Do you suppose it might have been someone who wanted Scott’s job? Believe me, he spread enough manure around the state that he probably had dreams of going nationwide and by golly he did just that. He fed this entire country a huge dose of manure . He really thought he was a clever soul didn’t he? I wouldn’t mind “needling” him just before he takes his last breath but his sentence will probably be commuted to life and that’s not all bad either. Everyday he will look at where he is and think about what he did to put himself there. He will think about the freedom he threw away. He will think about being unable to boat, golf, hang with family and friends, etc. I imagine he fantasizes about how many other women he could have cheated on his wife with and how many other outlandish lies he could have told to make himself appear more important than the manure salesman he was. He was an underachiever and he knew it so hence the dishonesty. He wanted to be what he knew he would never achieve. If he was a “real” man he would step up and take responsibility for what he did, but having a “child- like” mind in a grown man’s body that’s not going to happen. Again, for those who stand behind this manure salesman, when the wind blows, you will finally get a whiff of what this loser is all about….shit !

  106. flishface permalink
    March 27, 2013 5:24 pm

    Cricket, what kind of name is that? It should be Cricket ka-ka, because thats all your “well” thought out points are. Amber Frey wasn’t on trial for murder, why should she be given a lie detector test? The trunk of her car was checked, somehow you seem to doubt that it wasn’t. Now you want them to track it down and check for what? Don’t you think “if” there was something there, it would be compromised after all these years.
    You should get your head out of your ass, he’s a lowlife murderer. You sound like someone that donates to his family on a regular basis to find the “real” murderer and would probably marry him in a heart beat.
    My only hope is, they use a rusty dull needle when the time comes. I would rather take him out to the same spot in the bay, wire some concrete blocks to his ankles. Let him experience the same fate as his wife and unborn son.

    • carebear permalink
      May 24, 2013 1:57 am

      I weep for the souls of those that want to see others murdered in an insane manner!

  107. exitehasmisee permalink
    April 10, 2013 12:06 am

    dnuzr [url=http://redclshoes.info/]christian louboutin shoes[/url] dtmen pajcf hsabl otwrm fltvr yvbnb hkvyj jcfdu nvurs.
    pufxo [url=http://redclshoes.info/]cheap christian louboutin shoes[/url] ktlpc kdwwq niowm xntbx hjexm yjgop gthsg tzobf ctgnx.
    faxcg [url=http://redclshoes.info/]christian louboutin shoes outlet[/url] xagec epmye wfyfv ryqra hglfw uqcdg wflsa wlcnf knoqu.

    • flishface permalink
      April 14, 2013 9:39 pm

      exitehasmisee
      I agree with every word, makes perfect sense to me. Although I have mixed feelings on the wlenf & the ctgns issues.

  108. carebear permalink
    May 24, 2013 1:54 am

    I love Scott!! I only hope to meet him someday, possibly marry, have conjugals, and make babies!!

    • Sheila permalink
      May 24, 2013 8:27 am

      That’s if he doesn’t murder you first dumbass

    • jane permalink
      May 24, 2013 1:55 pm

      are you nuts he would do it again.once a killer always will be

  109. August 22, 2013 2:39 pm

    Based on what we saw with Casey Anthony, and perhaps even Zimmerman, I could see how some might think Scott Peterson deserves a new trial. However, It won’t happen. No one else had a motive to kill Laci, but her POS hubby. No one else lied about their whereabouts that 12/24. Scott Peterson is exactly where he needs to be. Locked up, unable to harm anyone else. He is probably doing really well in prison. No responsibilities, no one to tell him what to do. His parents make sure there is money in his Prison account. He is living a better life than Laci and her family and friends.

    • Chris Ferguson permalink
      August 22, 2013 3:23 pm

      Why must people comment on things they dont know enough about to comment? Your statements are completely inaccurate and dont prove murder. Scott DID NOT lie about where he was….he said he was at the marina. There is not 1 piece of evidence of his guilt and tons of his innocence. No one else had a reason to kill laci ??? What motive did Scott have? He killed his beautiful wife for that horse faced amber and some other guys kid??? Yeah right! There were several possibilities as to which I’ve always thought the most logical Was that laci walked up on the burglars WHO WERE ROBBING THE HOUSE ACROSS THE STREET AT THE EXACT TIME AS LACI DISAPPEARED…..bet u didnt even pay enough attention to know about that.

  110. September 20, 2013 3:36 pm

    I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was curious what all is needed
    to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost
    a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100%
    sure. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Cheers

    • Sheila permalink
      September 20, 2013 4:32 pm

      This is not from me, Sheila. I would never stoop so low as to post a pitch like this on a blog devoted to a specific topic.

      The real Sheila

  111. September 24, 2013 9:24 am

    Simply desire to say your article is as astonishing.
    The clearness in your post is just cool and i can assume
    you’re an expert on this subject. Well with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep
    updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the gratifying work.

  112. October 8, 2013 10:41 pm

    You are so awesome! I do not suppose I’ve read through something
    like that before. So wonderful to discover somebody
    with a few unique thoughts on this subject matter.

    Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This web site is
    something that is required on the web, someone with a bit of originality!

  113. October 17, 2013 10:21 pm

    Hello mates, nice article and good urging commented here,
    I am actually enjoying by these.

  114. October 18, 2013 8:18 am

    Very good information. Lucky me I found your site by accident (stumbleupon).
    I’ve book marked it for later!

  115. October 19, 2013 5:51 am

    Appreciating the time and energy you put into your
    blog and detailed information you present. It’s awesome to come across
    a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same out of date rehashed material.
    Wonderful read! I’ve saved your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

Trackbacks

  1. Kizi Games Free - Page 45

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: